2
$\begingroup$

Given the wave function $$\psi(x)=A\exp\left[-a \left(\frac{mx^{2}}{\hbar}+it\right)\right]$$ I would like to calculate $\sigma_{p}$.

\begin{align}\langle p\rangle &=\int \psi^{\star}\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)\psi dx\\ &=2imaA^{2}\int xe^{-kx^{2}}dx\\ &=0 \end{align} since the integrand is odd. (I let $k=\frac{2am}{\hbar}$)

Similarly, \begin{align} \langle p^2\rangle &=\int \psi^{\star}\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)^{2}\psi dx\\ &=-2A^{2}ma\hbar \left[\int kx^{2}e^{-kx^{2}}dx-\int e^{-kx^{2}}dx\right]\\ &=-2A^{2}ma\hbar\left[\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{k}}-\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{k}}\right]\\ &=0 \end{align}

But doesn't this imply $\sigma_{p}=\sqrt{\langle \widehat p^{2}\rangle -\langle \widehat p\rangle ^{2}}=0$ ?

I think that I must have made a mathematical error, because this result as it stands would violate the uncertainty principle as I understand it: $\sigma_{x}\sigma_{p}\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}$

But I don't see anything incorrect. Does $\sigma_{p}=0$ violate the uncertainty principle?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Kyle Kanos, Brandon Enright, John Rennie, JamalS, Emilio Pisanty Jan 26 '15 at 15:14

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – Kyle Kanos, Brandon Enright, John Rennie, JamalS, Emilio Pisanty
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The integrals you have look fine, but you've evaluated one of them with a factor out. $\endgroup$ – Holographer Jan 25 '15 at 19:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You also need to find the normalization constant, $A$, in order to get the value of $\sigma_p$. $\endgroup$ – Ihle Jan 25 '15 at 22:23
3
$\begingroup$

You have made an error in your calculation of ⟨p2⟩. You've evaluated two integrals, the second of which is off by a factor of two.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ah: $\int ^{\infty}_{-\infty} e^{-kx^{2}}dx = \sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{k}}$ $\endgroup$ – user44816 Jan 25 '15 at 23:16
1
$\begingroup$

There is an error in my calculation.

In fact: $\int ^{\infty}_{-\infty} e^{-kx^{2}}dx = \sqrt{\dfrac{\pi}{k}}$

So $$\langle \widehat p^{2} \rangle=-2A^{2}ma\hbar [\frac{-1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{k}}]=ma\hbar$$ given that $A^{2}=\sqrt{\frac{2am}{\pi\hbar}}$ as calculated using the normalization condition.

This, can be used to calculate $$\sigma_{p}=\sqrt{ma\hbar}$$ It can similarly be shown that $$\langle x^{2}\rangle=\frac{\hbar}{4ma}$$ and $$\langle x \rangle= 0$$so $$\sigma_{x}=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{4ma}}$$ and finally: $$\sigma_{p}\sigma_{x}=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar^{2}ma}{4ma}}=\frac{\hbar}{2}\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}$$which agrees with the uncertainty principle.

$\endgroup$