5
$\begingroup$

As per Landau-Ginzburg (LG) theory, we write down a theory (Hamiltonian) with all possible interactions/operators (in terms of some order parameter) that respects certain symmetries. The ground state (which varies with the tunable couplings/parameters in the theory) might partially break some of the symmetry spontaneously, and the behaviour of correlation functions (observables) depends on the spectrum of fluctuations about the ground state. So, we characterize the ground state and the spectrum of fluctuations by some local order parameter which tells us about the qualitative behaviour of the system (aka "phase").

How does the notion of "topological order" and "quantum states of matter at zero temperature" fit into this picture of matter and phases? I would appreciate if someone could place this in context. What are the observables we use to characterize states/phases? Is it talking about a different understanding of the same phenomena as LG, or does is aim to explain completely different phenomena? If it has a broader scope than LG, then does LG fit into this theory in some manner? Is there some overarching principle here, like my description above for LG theory?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ See Wiki en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_order . In physics, topological order is a kind of order in zero-temperature phase of matter that is beyond symmetry breaking description (i.e. there is no spontaneous symmetry breaking). Macroscopically, topological order is defined/described by robust ground state degeneracy and quantized non-Abelian geometric phases of degenerate ground states (just like superfluid order is defined/described by robust vanishing viscosity and quantized vorticity). $\endgroup$ – Xiao-Gang Wen Feb 10 '15 at 21:04
8
$\begingroup$

Topological order can not be described in Ginzburg-Landau symmetry breaking paradigm. It is actually fair to say that topological order are more or less the properties of (gapped) quantum phases that can not be captured by GL. One way to define it is to use the notion of adiabatic continuity: if two gapped phases of matter can be connected by adiabatically varying the Hamiltonian without gap closing, we consider them to be the same phase. So we are doing "homotopy" theory of quantum phases in some sense. One can demand the allowed Hamiltonians connecting different phases must preserve certain symmetries, then one get refined notions such as symmetry protected/enriched topological phases.

Generally speaking there are no local order parameters (sometimes a topologically ordered state also breaks certain symmetry, for example time-reversal symmetry, but this fact itself does not define topological order). And often times topologically ordered states do not break any microscopic symmetries (e.g. quantum spin liquid on a lattice).

In my opinion, two general "principles" for topological order are (1) emergent gauge structure: One can usually describe topological order and their phase transitions using some kind of emergent gauge theory. (2) Entanglement structure. If you ask for a mathematical framework, then modular tensor category theory captures the essence of two-dimensional topological order in an abstract but quite powerful way (up to some details about edge physics).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are both 1 & 2 necessaary, or are they only heuristic indicators? Does entanglement structure undergo any change across a spontaneous symmetry breaking transition, which could have been described in the LG paradigm? Or would the possible existence of local order parameters preclude you from calling these quantum phase transitions? $\endgroup$ – Siva Feb 18 '15 at 18:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.