2
$\begingroup$

In this post, $\hbar=c=1$ units are used throughout.

It is well known that the action of classical electromagnetism is given by $$\mathcal S_{\text{Maxwell}} = \int d^4x\left\{-\frac{1}{4\mu_0}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right\}$$ which yields a Lagrangian density $$\mathscr{L}_{\text{Maxwell}} = -(4\mu_0)^{-1}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}.$$

In P&S, however, they instead use the density $$\mathscr L = -\frac 1 4F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}.$$ This is a bit more natural than the real one, however to me it seems that this is insufficient to get $\mu_0$s and $\varepsilon_0$s into Maxwell's equations. I'm aware that in $c=1$ units $\varepsilon_0 = \mu_0^{-1}$ so we work with $\mu_0$s WLOG, but how does one get $\mu_0$ into the equation using P&S's Lagrangian?

$\endgroup$
0
6
$\begingroup$

He is also using Lorentz-Heaviside units for electromagnetic constants, in which $\varepsilon_0=\mu_0=1$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Ah, I didn't know that was part of the convention. Also, $\varepsilon_0=\mu_0=1$, right? :P $\endgroup$ – theage Jan 18 '15 at 2:44
  • $\begingroup$ @theage haha obviously, sorry for the mistake. Edited $\endgroup$ – glS Jan 18 '15 at 10:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.