5
$\begingroup$

Are there useful physical quantities with dimensions of distance-time?

The background for this question is a differential equation which I try to make sense of:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1095477/connections-between-the-solution-of-simple-ordinary-equation-normal-distributio

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
17
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I feel like I've seen this question before on this site but I can't find an earlier version. Separately, a related question: physics.stackexchange.com/q/32096 $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 7:52
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidZ: I have also tried to find a similar question on this site before posting but haven't found one either. $\endgroup$
    – vonjd
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ Can you give us some background? Has something with dimensions of $LT$ cropped up in a calculation, or is this just curiousity? $\endgroup$
    – John Rennie
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 7:56
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnRennie: I edited the question accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – vonjd
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 8:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlfredCentauri: Well, I think the answer is what Carl has already mentioned: That you have a constant (which is in these cases $1$) that has a unit so that both sides are unitwise equal again. $\endgroup$
    – vonjd
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

According to Wikipedia, the integral of position with respect to time is called the "Absement" which is a portmanteau of "absence" and "displacement." It seems the quantity is useful for measuring the net/average displacement, as you would divide this integral by the total time interval. It would also be useful for systems in which accumulated distance is dependent on a displacement and the length of a time of a given displacement. Examples include systems which expel power as a function of displacement, i.e. any kind of valve opening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absement

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The quantity LxT is of interest because it is invariant between inertial reference frames, even as velocity approaches c. LT = LoTo Doc

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
-3
$\begingroup$

Distance is rate of change of position. Now let's play around with physics formulas:

Acceleration is velocity over time, or distance over time over time, d/t/t. Multiply by time, and you get:

Velocity is distance over time, or distance over time, d/t. Multiply by time, and you get:

Displacement is distance, or position over time, d. Multiply by time, and you get:

Position is distance into time, or position, dt. Multiply by time...

Please give credit if this turns out to be an amazing physics insight.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
7
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Distance and position are both quantities with dimensions of length. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Oct 11, 2018 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ Was the first premise that distance is rate of change of position correct? If that is true, then how is the rest of my logic wrong? $\endgroup$
    – Abdul Moiz Qureshi
    Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 12:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, it was not. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see my mistake now. Distance is not a kind of motion, and hence can not have a time term in it. $\endgroup$
    – Abdul Moiz Qureshi
    Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ However, I still insist that position and displacement do not have the same dimensions. Positions are points, not lengths, and are scaler rather than vector quantities. $\endgroup$
    – Abdul Moiz Qureshi
    Commented Oct 12, 2018 at 15:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.