I have to show that $$q \equiv \int d^{3}\vec{x}\, J^0 = -\int d^{3}\vec{x}\ \partial_i F^{0i} = -\int \frac{1}{2} d^{3}\vec{x}\ \varepsilon^{ijk} \partial_{i}G_{jk} \tag{1}$$ (this is exactly what is given in the book) where $J^{\nu} = -\partial_{\mu} F^{\mu \nu}$ coming and $G^{\mu \nu} = -i\tilde{F}^{\mu \nu}$. The latter, $\tilde{F}^{\mu \nu}$ is the dual of $F^{\mu \nu}$ and it is given as $$\tilde{F}^{\mu \nu} = -\frac{i}{2} \varepsilon^{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}F_{\rho \sigma} \tag{2}$$

My attempt:

We have $G^{\mu \nu} = -i\tilde{F}^{\mu \nu} = -i (-\frac{i}{2} \varepsilon^{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}F_{\rho \sigma} ) = -\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}F_{\rho \sigma}$. Now if we fix $\sigma=0$ we have $-\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{jki}F_{i0}$ and inverting the indices in the field strength we obtain $$ G^{jk} = \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{jki}F_{0i}. $$ Therefore we see that $$2G^{jk}\varepsilon_{jki} = F_{0i}$$ but this is the opposite of what we want, i.e. $F$ must be proportional to half of $G$ and not vice versa. So, where is the mistake? Any help?

  • $\begingroup$ Are you intentionally neglecting the 0 superscripts in $\epsilon$? $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jan 5 '15 at 18:04
  • $\begingroup$ it's not clear why you're fixing $\sigma$ which is a dummy repeated index, hence involved in a sum from 0 to 3. Moreover, what is that thing that you claim equal to $-\frac12\epsilon^{jki}F_{i0}$? $\endgroup$ – Phoenix87 Jan 5 '15 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I am fixing $\sigma$ since I know that one of the indices has to be zero. Then, in order the $\varepsilon$ not to be zero we know that all other indices must be spacial hence it can be replaced by the 3d tensor. $\endgroup$ – Marion Jan 5 '15 at 18:48

The electromagnetic tensor can be written in the form $$F = \begin{bmatrix}0 & -\mathbf E\\\mathbf E & \star\mathbf B\end{bmatrix},$$ where $\star\mathbf B$ is the Hodge dual of $\mathbf B$, which in vector notation can be realised as the operator $\mathbf v\mapsto \mathbf B\times\mathbf v$ (I'm totally unsure about the signs, but everything should work if $F$ is skewsymmetric, only problem is that the physics might get a wee messed up). In this notation, its dual is then given by (again up to signs) $$\tilde F = \begin{bmatrix}0 & \mathbf B\\-\mathbf B & -\star\mathbf E\end{bmatrix},$$

Now $-\partial_i F^{0i} =\nabla\cdot\mathbf E$, which is $\rho$ by the first Maxwell's equation. $\frac12\epsilon^{ijk}G_{jk}$ is the Hodge dual of $-\star E$ which is $-\star\star\mathbf E = -\mathbf E$, hence again $-\frac12\partial_i\epsilon^{ijk}G_{jk} = \nabla\cdot\mathbf E=\rho$. Finally $$q = \int\rho\ \text d^3\mathbf x,$$ whence the result by substitution.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Hi and thanks for your answer. I struggle a little bit trying to translate everything in index notation. Any help would be appreciated, even more if you d let me know where I am wrong. $\endgroup$ – Marion Jan 5 '15 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ I believe it is clear from above that $F^{0i} = E^i$. The problem with your steps is that you fix an index, $\sigma$, which is actually running from 0 to 3. As for the expression involving the constitutive tensor $G$, the operation $-\frac12\epsilon^{ijk}G_{jk}$ is reversing the definition of $G$ in terms of $F$ and spitting out $E^i$ again. You can see this by going through the computation by doing all the sums explicitly. $\endgroup$ – Phoenix87 Jan 5 '15 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ I am confused. Should I not fix one index to be zero in order to get the conserved charge? Your answer is ok (btw thanks for it) but I cannot make it work with what I have. $\endgroup$ – Marion Jan 6 '15 at 1:42
  • $\begingroup$ You can fix $\mu$ or $\nu$ because they're not repeated $\endgroup$ – Phoenix87 Jan 6 '15 at 9:51
  • $\begingroup$ I got it. It is really simple and I got it thanks to your answer. It is one line and it is even simpler than what you wrote. Thanks a lot $\endgroup$ – Marion Jan 6 '15 at 10:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.