This question already has an answer here:

I understand that some isotopes of an element have a shorter half life, and decay more quickly into other elements. Other isotopes are described as stable and no half life is stated. For elements that have a stable isotope, does this isotope still have a half life, just a very long one? Are there isotopes which do not decay spontaneously, or do all isotopes have a half life?


marked as duplicate by rob, Brandon Enright, BMS, ACuriousMind, John Rennie Dec 31 '14 at 7:03

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If proton decay is real all isotopes have a half life, those which are considered stable in a world without proton decay will just live much longer than the rest. So far we were not able to measure the decay time of protons, so this question is really not decided by experiments or observations, yet. I have a feeling that the majority of physicists in the field now believe in proton-decay as being more or less inevitable, but a theoretical physicist should chime in about that. $\endgroup$ – CuriousOne Dec 26 '14 at 19:12
  • $\begingroup$ @CuriousOne yes I'd be interested to see an answer based on proton decay. $\endgroup$ – trichoplax Dec 26 '14 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ What does a githubphagocyte eat (phagocytose)? $\endgroup$ – WetSavannaAnimal Dec 27 '14 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance it was going to be just phagocyte to match my github name, but that was taken... $\endgroup$ – trichoplax Dec 27 '14 at 13:26
  • $\begingroup$ @CuriousOne But neutron decay is real, and not all isotopes containing neutrons have a half-life. $\endgroup$ – rob Dec 30 '14 at 16:11

This given link is list of different isotopes with half life time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_radioactive_isotopes_by_half-life

The release of radiation by unstable nuclei is called radioactive decay. This process occurs naturally and cannot be influenced by chemical or physical processes. The release of radiation is also a random event and overtime the activity of the radioactive material decreases. It is not possible to predict when an individual nucleus in a radioactive material will decay. But it is possible to measure the time taken for half of the nuclei in a radioactive material to decay. This is called the half life of radioactive material or radioisotope. This is the latest list of known isotopes :


given link below is I trust more http://ie.lbl.gov/education/isotopes.htm

  • $\begingroup$ The wikipedia list is marked as incomplete. Can you confirm whether all isotopes of all elements have a half life? $\endgroup$ – trichoplax Dec 26 '14 at 19:54

Please see, like an atom that has a ground state, and in that state it would remain always if it not disturbed by some influence from outside, (some irradiation with other particles), so there are nuclei whose state is the ground state. Such nuclei have no excess of energy to get rid of.

Let me give some examples: there are nuclei with too many protons, s.t. teir configuration is unstable. They are likely to undergo $\beta ^+$ decay, and emit a positron. Other nuclei have to many neutrons, s.t. they may emit one or more neutrons, or may undergo $\beta ^-$ decay.

In short, yes, there are stable nuclei, or, in other words, there are ground states for nuclei.

Long lived unstable isotopes, are not in the ground states, but in some resonant states, very narrow from the point of view of the energy range encompassed by that resonance. The narrower the resonance, the longer is its half-life. But, I repeat, a resonant state, long lived as it may be, is not a ground state.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's interesting to hear that there are nuclei in the ground state that are not susceptible to spontaneous decay. Could you include an example of an element that has such a nucleus? $\endgroup$ – trichoplax Dec 26 '14 at 13:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Could you take another look at your opening sentence? I think you started saying one thing and ended up saying another - makes it confusing. Otherwise a nice post. $\endgroup$ – Floris Dec 26 '14 at 13:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.