1
$\begingroup$

I'm reading A simple derivation of the Lindblad equation.

It introduces a Hamiltonian for a system consisting of a principal system $S$, a heat bath $B$ and an interaction term: $\hat{H}=\hat{H}_S+\hat{H}_B+\alpha\hat{H}_{SB}$.

It then switches to using operators $\hat{H}(t)$ and $\hat{\rho}(t)$ in the interaction picture.

On page 3 it says "$\bar{H}_{SB}$ can always be defined in a manner in which the first term on the right hand size of Eq. (10) is zero."

Here is Eq. (10):

$\frac{d}{dt}\hat{\rho}_S(t)=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\alpha \text{Tr}_B\left\{[\hat{H}(t),\hat{\rho}(0)]\right\}+\ldots$

As $H_{SB}$ is a given, I'm not sure how we can choose anything to make that term zero. What does the statement mean?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As far as I can tell, those notes contain at least two statements that are at best imprecise and at worst misleading/downright wrong. A good reference for this derivation, which is equally simple, is Breuer and Petruccione Section 3.3.1. $\endgroup$ – Mark Mitchison Jul 25 '16 at 0:58
2
$\begingroup$

The statement is almost true, although one has to redefine both $H_S$ and $H_{SB}$ to make it work. You need to also make use of the standard assumption of factorising initial conditions, $$ \rho(0) = \rho_S(0)\otimes \rho_B,$$ where $\rho_B$ is the bath reference state, which must commute with the bath Hamiltonian, i.e. $[\rho_B,H_B]=0$. Often (but not always) the bath state is taken to be thermal $$ \rho_B = \frac{\mathrm{e}^{-\beta H_B}}{Z}.$$ Using the cyclicity of the partial trace, you can show that the offending term is equal to $$\mathrm{Tr}_B\left\lbrace[H(t),\rho_S(0)\otimes \rho_B]\right\rbrace = [\mathrm{Tr}_B\{H(t)\rho_B\},\rho_S(0)]\},$$ where the operator $\mathrm{Tr}_B\{H(t)\rho_B\}$ acts only in the Hilbert space of the system.

In order to remove this term, define the shifted Hamiltonians $$H_{SB}' = H_{SB} - \mathrm{Tr}_B\{H_{SB}\rho_B\},$$ $$H_A'= H_{A} + \mathrm{Tr}_B\{H_{SB}\rho_B\},$$ so that $H = H_A' + H_B + H_{SB}'$ is unchanged. Then, carrying out the derivation as before using the new Hamiltonians, you should be able to prove that $$\mathrm{Tr}_B\left\lbrace[H'(t),\rho_S(0)\otimes \rho_B]\right\rbrace = 0, $$ where $$H'(t) = \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(H_A'+H_B)t}H_{SB}'\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}(H_A'+H_B)t}.$$ In practice, one finds that common interaction Hamiltonians often already satisfy the desired property $\mathrm{Tr}_B\{H_{SB}\rho_B\}=0$ for states $\rho_B$ that are diagonal in the reservoir energy eigenbasis.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.