4
$\begingroup$

For complex $\phi$ in $U(1)$ gauge theory, \begin{align} |\phi_1|^2 + |\phi_2|^2 +\cdots |\phi_N|^2 =r \end{align} This equation $|\phi|^2=r$, describes sphere $S^{2N-1}$. Dividing the space of this solution by the gauge group $U(1)$ we obtain that the moduli space for $\phi$ which is $\mathbf{CP}^{N-1}$

This procedure is based on the explanation in Witten's paper of "Phase of $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories in two dimensions". (Above situation corresponds to $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric $U(1)$ gauge theory with $N$ chiral superfields. Here i solve the equation for minimizng potential energy.)


Here what i want to extend this idea to following equations,
(This situation corresponds to $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric $U(1)$ gauge theory with $N$ chiral superfields and $N$ anti-chiral superfields. )

For same complex $\phi$ in $U(1)$ gauge theory, we have \begin{align} |\phi_1|^2 + |\phi_2|^2 \cdots +|\phi_N|^2 -|\phi_{N+1}|^2 - |\phi_{N+2}|^2 \cdots - |\phi_{2N}|^2 =r \end{align}

The results for this moduli space is known as $T^* \mathbf{CP}^{N-1}$ where $T^*$ represents cotangent bundle.

Here i want to know why this space is $T^* \mathbf{CP}^{N-1}$.

Can anyone give some explanation about this?


In Kentaro hori et al's Mirror symmetry textbook, i found some interesting remarks seems to related with this problem. For four matter fields with charge $1,1,-1,-1$, the vacua equation can be reduced to \begin{align} |\phi_1|^2 + |\phi_2|^2 - |\phi_3|^2 - |\phi_4|^2 =r \end{align} For $r>>0$ this vacua makes $\mathcal{O}(-1) \oplus \mathcal{O}(-1)$ over $\mathbf{CP}^1$ where the base is $(\phi_1, \phi_2)$ and for $r<<0$ case vacua makes $\mathcal{O}(-1) \oplus \mathcal{O}(-1)$ over $\mathbf{CP}^1$ where the base is $(\phi_3, \phi_4)$.

At this moment i got confused.

Can one say that the $T^{*}\mathbf{CP}^1 = \mathcal{O}(-1) \oplus \mathcal{O}(-1)$ over $\mathbf{CP}^1$ ?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Comment to the question (v3): Consider adding references in order to receive useful and focused answers. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Dec 22 '14 at 13:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I cannot imagine your sources simply state that this is $T^*\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ without at least some explanation. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Dec 22 '14 at 15:06
  • $\begingroup$ My reference is witten's paper of Phase of N=2 theories in two dimensions. For $T^{*} CP^{N-1}$, I refer Gadde's $2d index and surface operator" $\endgroup$ – phy_math Dec 24 '14 at 8:03
  • $\begingroup$ I heard that this kinds of interpretations had been studied. But i cannot find any relevant resources... $\endgroup$ – phy_math Dec 24 '14 at 8:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.