2
$\begingroup$

Consider a scalar field coupled to a source $$(\Box - m^2)\phi(x) = -J(x)\tag{1}.$$ Then, the response of the source is determined by the Green's function $G(x-y)$, which satisfies $$(\Box - m^2)G(x-y)=-\delta(x-y) \tag{2}.$$ In Euclidean signature the Green's function which is the solution of the previous equation, can be written as the Fourier transform $$G(x-y)= \int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d} \frac {e^{ik\cdot(x-y)}}{k^2+m^2} \tag{3}.$$ I cannot understand how given (3) the solution of (1) can be expressed as the integral $$\phi(x)=\int d^d y G(x-y)J(y)\tag{4}.$$

My guess is that one has to take (1) and act somehow (4) but right now I cannot see how to arrive to (4). I would appreciate some help.

P.S. My main problem is the fact that in the following semi-proof \begin{align} (\Box-m^2)\phi &= (\Box - m^2)\int dy \, J(y) \phi_i(x-y) \\ &= \int dy \, J(y) {\color{red}{(\Box - m^2)}}\phi_i(x-y) \\ &= \int dy \, J(y) {\color{red}{\delta(x-y)}} \\ &= J(x) \end{align} Not only I do not get the minus sign of (1) but also I do not understand why we use the homogeneous Klein-Gordon equation to get the red delta function in a problem where we begun with the inhomogeneous one!

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I learned something with that \color{}{} command. $\endgroup$ – BMS Dec 15 '14 at 17:31
2
$\begingroup$

First, the obvious explanation for the sign is that if $J$ has a minus sign in (1), then there should be a minus sign in (4).

For some reason your $G$ turned into $\phi_i$. Assuming that they are the same thing, then I'm not sure I understand your problem. We didn't use the homogeneous KG equation to get the delta function; we used the inhomogeneous one, with $J(x) = \delta(x-y)$. If $\phi_i$ was a solution to the homogeneous KG equation, $(\Box-m^2)\phi_i$ would be zero, not $\delta(x-y)$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi. I am using Freedman's Supergravity textbook and both (1) and (4) (eqs 4.16 and 4.20 in the book) have these signs. As for the second part, I was a bit confused trying to understand the whole thing from various sources. But in the end, indeed this $\phi_i$ is just $G$. $\endgroup$ – Marion Dec 15 '14 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, the signs confused me too. (4) is correct, the problem is in the red part; the second of these (and the last line) should have a minus sign. $\endgroup$ – Javier Dec 15 '14 at 15:42
  • $\begingroup$ And why is that? $\endgroup$ – Marion Dec 15 '14 at 15:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Marion: Because $(\Box-m^2)\phi_i(x-y) = -\delta(x-y)$. $\endgroup$ – Javier Dec 15 '14 at 16:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.