# Newtons third law and unbreakability [closed]

We all know Newton's third law.

But then why this law doesn't work when we place a 1000KG heavy container on a small weak table. The table will break. Pressure is exerted on table by container, and table exerts force on the ground.

Similarly a heavy pillar will break a weak wall while leaning upon it.

## closed as unclear what you're asking by ACuriousMind♦, Kyle Kanos, Danu, Brandon Enright, JamalSDec 16 '14 at 17:00

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• I don't see how you get from the table breaking to assuming that Newton's third law is invalid. – David Z Dec 14 '14 at 14:03
• I am asking this because when body rests on table we say it is because of normal reaction which is equal and opposite. But what if body is very heavy ? – AnjumSKhan Dec 14 '14 at 14:05
• I would appreciate if you can explain the answer instead of down voting. – AnjumSKhan Dec 14 '14 at 14:05
• I would appreciate if you ask a question. – pfnuesel Dec 14 '14 at 14:10
• Equal and opposite forces do not imply immobility. You can have motion because the forces are acting on different bodies. See related posts on the side ---> – ja72 Dec 14 '14 at 15:33