15
$\begingroup$

Why do spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ nuclei have zero electric quadrupole moment? How does this come about, and how can one tell in general whether a spin-$j$ nucleus can have a nonzero quadrupole (or higher multipole) moment?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I'm pretty certain you can show that $\langle\frac{1}{2}|Q|\frac{1}{2}\rangle = 0$, where $Q$ is the quadrupole operator. However the details have slipped from what I laughingly refer to as my memory. This might give you enough clues to Google the answer. $\endgroup$ Dec 14, 2014 at 10:56
  • $\begingroup$ As far as I've googled, it looks not that simple. I found no credible answer. $\endgroup$
    – xiaohuamao
    Dec 18, 2014 at 8:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/a/244110/44126 $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Mar 18, 2016 at 2:49

2 Answers 2

14
+50
$\begingroup$

The answer is: The Wigner-Eckart theorem.

In plain old angular momentum coupling (see Clebsch-Gordan coefficients) we learn that if a system consists of a spin-1/2 subsystem and a spin-2 subsystem, then the total system altogether can be spin-5/2 or spin-3/2, no other value. The rules are

  1. $|j_1-j_2| \leq j_\mathrm{total} \leq j_1+j_2$
  2. $j_1+j_2+j_\mathrm{total}$ is an integer.

Well, the Wigner-Eckart theorem teaches us that similar rules apply involving operators. The electric quadrupole operator $Q$ can be expressed as a rank-2 spherical tensor operator. When it acts on a spin-1/2 system, the resulting spin can only be $\frac{5}{2}$ or $\frac{3}{2}$. So if you're calculating $\langle\frac{1}{2}| Q|\frac{1}{2}\rangle$, you can group it like $\langle \frac{1}{2}| \;\;\; Q |\frac{1}{2}\rangle$. In other words, this is the inner product of a spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ system with $Q|\frac{1}{2}\rangle$ (which is spin $\frac{3}{2}$ or $\frac{5}{2}$). So they're orthogonal; the inner product is zero. $\langle\frac{1}{2}| Q |\frac{1}{2}\rangle=0$.

By similar logic, dipole moments (electric or magnetic) require spin ≥ 1/2, quadrupole moments require spin ≥ 1, octupole moments require spin ≥ 3/2, etc. (Dipole operators are rank 1, quadrupole are rank 2, octupole are rank 3, etc.)

$\endgroup$
0
0
$\begingroup$

I want to supplement the formal answer by Steve Byrnes above with a simple observation that makes it obvious in practice that a spin 1/2 cannot meaningfully have a quadrupole moment.

To see this, note that the quadrupole interaction enters the Hamiltonian through a term of the form

$V = \vec{I}\cdot \mathbb{Q} \cdot \vec{I}$,

where $\vec{I}$ is the nuclear spin vector and where $\mathbb{Q}$ is the quadrupole tensor. The quadrupole tensor is symmetric, so there is always a basis in which it is diagonal. So without loss of generality, let's just focus on interactions of the form

$V = \mathbb{Q}_{xx} I_x^2 + \mathbb{Q}_{yy} I_y^2 + \mathbb{Q}_{zz} I_z^2$,

where $\mathbb{Q}_{jj}$ is the $j$th diagonal component of the quadrupole tensor. For a spin 1/2, the spin operators are half the Pauli operators, $I_j = \sigma_i/2$. As a consequence, they always square to $1/4$. So

$V = \frac{1}{4}\left(\mathbb{Q}_{xx} + \mathbb{Q}_{yy} + \mathbb{Q}_{zz}\right) = \frac{1}{4}\textrm{Tr}\left(\mathbb{Q}\right)$.

But because the quadrupole tensor is always traceless, this means that $V = 0$ identically. Thus, even if we posited a quadrupole moment for the spin 1/2, it could not enter the Hamiltonian. The algebra of the spin-1/2 operators only allows for zero quadrupole interaction.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.