2
$\begingroup$

Many text books emphasize that the quantum field is not wavefunction. But because of the similarity in the format, I could not stop from wondering whether they are actually the same thing.

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ No, a quantum field is a superposition of operators ;-) $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Kalitvianski Dec 13 '14 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ @VladimirKalitvianski, your answer may be valid. But this is not what I expected. Is there a more physical explanation on this argument? $\endgroup$ – Fine Observer Dec 13 '14 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ In my opinion, it is a matter of definition. We define quantum fields, find out their equations and use them to calculate the occupation number evolutions. $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Kalitvianski Dec 13 '14 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ This question might be helpful: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/16091/… $\endgroup$ – jinawee Dec 13 '14 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ I read several links in SE on this matter, such as "is a quantum field observable?", and tried hard to understand this issue in my own way. The underlying state is point in Fock space, the superposition of 1 particle, 2 particles, ... states. By acting on one of the states, the quantum field $\phi (x,t)$ attaches a space-time meaning to the underlying state. $\endgroup$ – Fine Observer Dec 14 '14 at 21:06
1
$\begingroup$

A wavefunction is (typically understood to be) a complex valued function on configuration space; a wave function assigns a complex number (probability amplitude) to each point in configuration space. For a system of $N$ particles, the system's wavefunction is $3N$ dimensional.

A quantum field, on the other hand, is an operator valued function on physical space; a quantum field assigns an operator to each event in spacetime.

These are clearly fundamentally different.

One can make a connection between a single particle wavefunction and a quantum field in the following way.

$|0\rangle$ is the vacuum (no particle) state of the system, $\phi^*(x,t)$ is the operator which creates a particle with definite location $x$ at time $t$, and $\Psi(x,t)$ is a 1 particle wavefunction.

Then, a 1 particle state described described by the wavefunction $\Psi$ is given by

$$\int dx \;\Psi(x,t)\;\phi^*(x,t)|0\rangle$$

That is, the state is a superposition over all 1 particle states, $\phi^*(x,t)|0\rangle$, weighted by $\Psi(x,t)$.

For a 2 particle state, the generalization is

$$\int dx_1 dx_2 \;\Psi(x_1, x_2,t)\;\phi^*(x_1,t)\phi^*(x_2,t)|0\rangle $$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

A quick answer is that simple wave functions can not describe the processes of annihilation and creation represented in fields. Fields support multi-particles states in a way that wave functions can not.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.