Commutator of $\rm SU(2)$ Casimir operators in $\rm su(3)$ I have a $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ Lie algebra spanned by 8 generators,
$$\left\{J_1,J_2,J_3,J_4,J_5,J_6,J_7,J_8 \right\}$$
Now, I can choose infinitely many $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ sub-algebras composed of three operators (does not have to be generators but also linear combinations). For every such subalgebra I can define Casimir operator. I want to know if Casimir operators from different subalgebras commute with each other or not? Maybe there is some theorem I don't know about?
 A: A good question, especially, as I indicated in my comment above, the Casimirs of U-spin, I-spin and V-spin, all diagonal in the Gell-Mann basis do commute. But I will provide below a simple counterexample, where they don't. By the way, the title of the question confuses people into thinking about SU(3) Casimirs, not SU(2) ones, which you are asking about. You might have retitled it to "SU(2) Casimirs in SU(3)".
So here are two SU(2)s I am considering, in the Gell-Mann basis. The first one is just I-spin, comprised of $\vec{I}=(\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3)$,
and the 2nd one the formally equivalent one, $U \vec{I} U^{-1}$, where, for simplicity, take $U\equiv \exp(i\theta \lambda_4)$. The corresponding quadratic SU(2) Casimirs are, un-normalized, C=diag(1,1,0), idempotent, and $UCU^{-1}$, respectively.
You are asking if $[C,UCU^{-1} ]$vanishes or not. It suffices to check that the term linear in θ fails to vanish (the zeroth order term vanishing, of course). That is, you are inspecting 
$$
i\theta (C\lambda_4 C -C\lambda_4 -\lambda_4 C+C\lambda_4C).
$$
Since $C\lambda_4 C=0$, and the other two terms in the parenthesis add up to $-\lambda_4$, the commutator fails to vanish, $=-i\theta \lambda_4$ plus higher orders in θ, and the answer to your question is: not.
