5
$\begingroup$

As the title says, I was wondering what the difference was between a Type-1 and a Type-2 Superconductor. Especially in terms of the Coherent Length and Penetration Depth of a Magnetic Field - and how their relative sizes affect whether a Superconductor is Type-1 or Type-2.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In type I superconductors, transition from normal state to superconducting state occurs instantly while in type II superconductors transition happens slowly i.e. by decreasing temperature after critical temperature superconducting properties increase, also in type II superconductors some magnetic field lines can penetrate through superconductor while in type I superconductors it's impossible (i.e. magnetic field lines cannot penetrate though superconductors) also most type II superconductors have higher critical temperature $\endgroup$ – Gigi Butbaia Dec 6 '14 at 17:48
8
$\begingroup$

Introduction:

Superconductivity is phenomenon when certain materials electrical resistance drops sharply to zero when their temperature is lowered below it's critical temperature ($T_c$), There are two types of superconductors $\mathrm{Type\text{ }I}$ and $\mathrm{Type\text{ }II}$.

Type I Superconductors:

In $\mathrm{Type\text{ }I}$ superconductors transition from normal state to superconducting state occurs instantly i.e. at exactly it's critical/transition temperature $T_c$:

enter image description here

also this type of superconductors "repel" magnetic field lines fully, i.e. no magnetic field line could penetrate through in this type of superconductors:

Type I Superconductors

As you can see no magnetic field line penetrates though this type of superconductor

Type II Superconductors:

In $\mathrm{Type\text{ }II}$ superconductors transition from a normal state to a superconducting state occurs "slowly" i.e. as you decrease temperature from it's critical temperature superconducting properties increase:

enter image description here

As you can see on image, there is small curve which approaches zero resistance after critical temperature $T_c$. The Common and most popular example of Type II superconductor is YBCO superconductor, which critical temperature is $90K$. Also some magnetic field lines can penetrate though in this type of superconductors allowing Flux Pinning which is also know as Quantum Locking:

YBCO

As you can see on image, some magnetic field lines can penetrate though this type of superconductors, thus resulting aforementioned Flux pinning. Using this it is possible to say that this type of superconductors aren't ideal superconductors.

Conclusion:

So there are few differences between Type I and Type II superconductors, first of them it transition of superconducting state, second is magnetic field lines. Also there are few more differences between them, for example Type I superconductors always have lower critical temperature than the most of Type II superconductors, also There is theory (BCS Theory) which explains only type I superconductors but can't explain type II superconductors (i.e. High temperature superconductivity)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is a great answer to my original question - and it is also pleasing to see that others have wondered the same thing, and learnt something. $\endgroup$ – zordman Aug 4 '15 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ Is there any reference for different nature of phase transitions in type-I and type-II superconductors? The YBCO data is legit, but the first figure is merely a sketch. Also, thin superconducting films can all trap magnetic flux under perpendicular magnetic field, regardless, whether type I or II. $\endgroup$ – LLlAMnYP Apr 20 '17 at 12:56

protected by Community Dec 2 '15 at 20:36

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.