2
$\begingroup$

The things I'm pretty sure I understand: Let's say I have a single particle hamiltonian $H$ represented by a $2$x$2$ matrix, so it has two eigenstates $|\lambda_1\rangle$ and $|\lambda_2\rangle$. I can define two projectors onto these states $P_1=|\lambda_1\rangle\langle\lambda_1|$ and $P_2=|\lambda_2\rangle\langle\lambda_2|$. Now if we look at a 2-particle system, the Hamiltonian of particle 1 in the direct product space is $H_1=H\otimes I$ and the Hamiltonian of particle 2 is $H_2=I\otimes H$. If I understand correctly, the new space is spanned by, for example, the following 4 states: $|\lambda_i\rangle\otimes|\lambda_j\rangle$, for $i,j=1,2$. $H_1$ will have 4 eigenvectors which correspond to the energy eigenstates $H_1|n\rangle=E_n|n\rangle$ of particle 1 in the two particle system. I can then construct 4 projectors onto these states which are defined in a similar way as above, and I will call them $P'_n$ for $n=1,2,3,4$.

The question: I want to show that, for an arbitrary state in the two-particle vector space, $P'_nf(E_n)|\psi\rangle=P'_nf(H_1)|\psi\rangle$ where $f(E_n)$ is some function of the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian and $|\psi\rangle$. I know how to do this for a one particle system, but I have no intuition for direct products yet and I can't work out how to reconcile the fact that $H$ has 2 states but $H_1$ has 4 in an attempt to express $P'_n$ in terms of $P_1$ and $P_2$. I can expand in terms of the two particle basis $|\psi\rangle=\sum_{i,j}c_ib_j|\lambda_i\rangle\otimes|\lambda_j\rangle$. Then apply the projector $|n\rangle\langle n|$ but at this point I'm out of ideas. Is there some way to write the eigenfunctions of $H_1$ in terms of the eigenfunctions of $H$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ just a quick point: $|\psi\rangle=\sum_{i,j}c_ib_j|\lambda_i\rangle\otimes|\lambda_j\rangle$ is not an arbitrary state but instead is the special case of a factorisable or unentangled state. The co-efficients here are the Kronecker product of the column vectors $c$ and $b$ and is wholly defined by $2 N$ complex values in the column vector. A general, entangled state has $|\psi\rangle=\sum_{i,j}C_{i\,j}|\lambda_i\rangle\otimes|\lambda_j\rangle$, i.e. you can't split the $N^2$ independent co-efficients into something of the form $b\otimes c$. $\endgroup$ – WetSavannaAnimal Dec 2 '14 at 6:50
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for pointing this out, I have't studied entanglement before so it's nice to see what it means in it's mathematical glory. $\endgroup$ – Lachy Dec 2 '14 at 14:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is a common mistake in terminology: the direct product $\times$ is more akin to the direct sum $\oplus$; what you have is the tensor product $\otimes$. One important difference is that $\dim(A\oplus B)=\dim(A)+\dim(B)$, while $\dim(A\otimes B)=\dim(A)\dim(B)$. Unfortunately $2+2=2\cdot2$, so it's easier to get confused in this particular case. $\endgroup$ – user10851 Dec 2 '14 at 19:02
  • $\begingroup$ Okay so what am I actually dealing with here: a "tensor product space" or a "direct sum space"? I assume it's the tensor product space since $\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{H}_1\otimes\mathcal{H}_2$ and in this case it makes sense to think of $\text{dim}(\mathcal{H})=\text{dim}(\mathcal{H}_1)\text{dim}(\mathcal{H}_2)$ (from the analogy to the spin-1/2 case with two particles, where we think of the 4 resulting states as being ordered pairs of spin-ups and spin-downs). But the direct sum does come into the picture when we think of the "total" Hamiltonian $H=H_1\oplus H_2$, so I would like to be sure. $\endgroup$ – Lachy Dec 3 '14 at 1:31
2
$\begingroup$

This is quite simple. Consider the operator $H$ on the Hilbert space $\mathscr{H}$, in your simple example it has a spectral resolution: $$H=\sum_{n}E_n \lvert n\rangle\langle n \rvert\; .$$ Each eigenvalue has multiplicity 1. Now the operators $H_1$ and $H_2$ on $\mathscr{H}\otimes\mathscr{H}$ have the same spectrum of $H$, but each eigenvalue has multiplicity $\mathrm{dim} [\mathscr{H}]$, and the orthonormal eigenvectors will be the tensor product of an eigenvector of $H$ and a vector of the orthonormal basis of $\mathscr{H}$ (in the respective order). The spectral resolutions are directly inherited by the one of $H$: $$H_1=\sum_{n}E_n \bigl(\lvert n\rangle\langle n \rvert\ \otimes 1\bigr)\;,\; H_2=\sum_{n}E_n \bigl(1\otimes\lvert n\rangle\langle n \rvert\ \bigr)\; .$$ Apply now the projection on a factorized vector $\psi_1\otimes\psi_2$ for example on $H_1$: $$\lvert \psi_1\otimes\psi_2\rangle\langle \psi_1\otimes\psi_2 \rvert H_1= \sum_n E_n \langle \psi_1,n\rangle \bigl( \lvert\psi_1\rangle\langle n\rvert\otimes\lvert\psi_2\rangle\langle\psi_2\rvert \bigr)\; .$$ Now suppose that $\psi_1=m$, where $m$ is an eigenvector of $H$, orthogonal to all the others (and normalized). Then the scalar products in the sum vanish apart from $n=m$. Thus you obtain: $$\tag{1}\lvert m\otimes\psi_2\rangle\langle m\otimes\psi_2 \rvert H_1=E_m \lvert m\otimes\psi_2\rangle\langle m\otimes\psi_2 \rvert \; .$$

Remark: Observe that I used more than once the fact that for factorized vectors $\lvert \psi_1\otimes\psi_2\rangle\langle \psi_1\otimes\psi_2 \rvert= \lvert\psi_1\rangle\langle \psi_1\rvert\otimes\lvert\psi_2\rangle\langle\psi_2\rvert$.

Equation (1)---with $\psi_2$ chosen as an element of the orthonormal basis of $\mathscr{H}$---is the relation on the projectors onto eigenvectors of $H_1$ you look for. This is extended to functions of $H_1$ since for any suitably regular function $f$, $f(H)=\sum_{n}f(E_n) \lvert n\rangle\langle n \rvert$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I appreciate this response very much, thanks. It answers my question exactly, and very clearly, with a nice justification for each step. $\endgroup$ – Lachy Dec 2 '14 at 16:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.