0
$\begingroup$

I'm fascinated by space and physics but not exactly well-versed in them, so I'll try to keep this question as simple as possible.

Imagine a person acting as an observer in a room with two large sub-rooms or "bubbles" of space that we will call Bubble A and Bubble B. Each area has a hamster wheel in it, in which a hamster is running in motion perpetually. These areas (and I guess the room itself, by necessity) exist in different time-scales.

The mechanics of this are not important for this question, as I'm mostly interested in the visuals. You can imagine it as being created by some science-fiction gizmo if you like. The main thing to remember is that each bubble is clearly defined and surrounded by a clearly defined "membrane" that is also transparent for the sake of our observer.

In Bubble A, time is moving more slowly than the room the observer is in. In Bubble B, time is moving more quickly than the room the observer is in. The amount of difference can be adjusted.

What would it look like for the observer (who is outside of both Bubbles A and B) to look into Bubble A or Bubble B? Would Bubble A look redshifted, and Bubble B blueshifted? Would the image "curve" around the bubble in some sort of lensing effect?

As Bubble A's timescale changed so that it was moving even slower than the observer's time, would it look as though the hamster wheel had come to a virtual stop altogether? Would it begin to fade away as less light "escapes" from the bubble? Let's assume that it cannot go so slow as to become effectively a black hole.

Similarly, would Bubble B look like things were moving in fast-motion, or so fast as to become imperceptibly fast? Would the hamster wheel become a blur? Would this bubble look extremely bright, approaching complete whiteness?

I'm curious how similar this is to the event horizon of a black hole. I'm assuming an observer stepping into one of the two Areas wouldn't "notice" as they instantly adjust to whatever time frame they are in. But what if they reached out their hand into Bubble A or Bubble B? For instance, if our observer-person stuck their hand into Bubble B, in which time is moving faster than that of the room they are presently in, would their hand age before their eyes? If they pulled back their hand, might they pull back only bony remains (or nothingness if enough time had passed)?

Thank you for your help!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Here's a short film which describes your scenario. Time Trap. $\endgroup$ – Chloe Apr 10 '15 at 23:41
1
$\begingroup$

Your scenario can't physically exist. You can't separate areas of space within bubbles and adjust time within them arbitrarily then compare them.

Time dilation occurs due to speed or gravitational potential.

This means you can't instantly step from one place where time is running normally to one where it is running faster. This is because you need to adjust your speed (accelerate/decelerate) to match the speed of another frame of reference OR if you're in a gravity field they change gradually so you need to move a fair distance before it changes appreciably.

Red shift occurs when you move away from a light source (or the light source is moving away from you) and blue shift occurs when you move towards a light source (or the light source is moving towards you). This is similar to the Doppler effect with sound. It's a shift in frequency due to speed of the source or of the observer. In your scenario you don't have movement of source or observer so there won't be any red/blue shift.

Edit: An observer watching a spaceship travelling at relativistic speeds will note that time has appeared to slow down on the spaceship. This effects everything equally, so that clocks run slower, electrical signals travel slower, people move slower, computers calculate slower. Because everything is slowed down at the same rate a person on the ship moving slowly won't notice they are moving slowly as they are also thinking slowly. From their perspective time is running at it's normal rate and any experiment they perform to check the flow of time will perform exactly the same as in the stationary observer's frame of reference.

The two frames of reference are equally valid and can't be distinguished between without outside information. It is only one reference frame's observation of the other that notes the time dilation.

It is also important to note that due to the speed difference in these two frames of reference you can't ever hop instantly from one to the other (e.g. in your question, place your hand in a zone where time is running faster). You would need to accelerate your hand up to relativistic speeds to experience this, at which point you have lost your hand as your body is still stationary.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I understand the physical impossibility of the scenario, but I'm hoping that the "theoretical" concept is still understandable. Maybe a viewing "portal" into another space where time speeds are different would make more sense for the explanation I'm seeking, which is focused on what one would "see" in such a scenario. For instance, the common "spaceship" example says if you looked at the clock on the ship flying at a fast speed, it would appear to be moving slower than your own on earth, and visa-versa. Does that mean the people in the ship also appear to be moving in slow-motion? $\endgroup$ – bearcano Dec 1 '14 at 10:34
  • $\begingroup$ Added some more info to the answer. Also have a look at this link on what a relativistic interstellar traveller would see $\endgroup$ – Quantumplate Dec 1 '14 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the helpful response, the link on the interstellar traveler really helped too. To clarify my understanding, it would seem then that if a person looked into a spaceship flying fast enough, it would appear that everything on the ship had been frozen in time, of course only in reference to the observer's perspective. The hamster wheel would move very slowly indeed. I think this also means that viewing a site of very low gravity compared to yours would make things appear to move very quickly due to the gravitational time dilation. Is that right? $\endgroup$ – bearcano Dec 1 '14 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ You are essentially correct. Note that a spaceship can't physically reach the speed of light (it requires infinite energy) so time can never be frozen. It will only ever be slowed down by some amount (relative to the observer). The low gravity scenario is also correct, very accurate clocks will run slower the deeper in a gravity well they are but the effect on Earth is small so you won't notice astronauts in space aging faster than people on Earth. $\endgroup$ – Quantumplate Dec 1 '14 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for your help! I think I have a better understanding of it. I understand it can't reach the speed of light so it would only "approach" a complete standstill, but as it got close enough I figure it would pretty much appear that way to the human eye. Putting this all into a picture really helps my understanding. Thanks again. $\endgroup$ – bearcano Dec 1 '14 at 21:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.