1
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

Hi,

I'm trying to use the solution to the wave's equation in a rectangular waveguide for $\tilde{E}$ and $\tilde{H}$ to show how I can get the above picture. For example, why is the magnetic field looping around? Why is the electric field diverging towards the walls?

Can someone show me how I can get the above picture based on the following set of equations? (taken from here)

enter image description here

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Can someone prove [...]" As usual you use the proposed structure of the fields to make a observable prediction (say what the cut-off frequency for the mode would be) and then subject it to experimental test under conditions where different modes give different observables. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Nov 28 '14 at 16:21
3
$\begingroup$

For example, why is the magnetic field looping around?

Yours is nothing more (nor less) than the intuitive statement of $\nabla\cdot B=0$. Flux lines of a divergenceless field cannot "begin" or "end"; they must loop if $\nabla\cdot B=0$ holds at all points. Otherwise, a nonzero divergence betokens charge density, as with the electric field lines which are described by $\nabla\cdot E=\rho/\epsilon_0$.

Why is the electric field diverging towards the walls?

The walls are assumed to be perfect conductors. That means that, if there were a tangential component of the electric field at the walls, charge would instantly shift, thus giving rise to a cancellation field. Equilibrium is reached when the electric field lines pierce the walls at right angles. You assume equilibrium because you must assume a good enough conductivity that the charge shifting is a great deal faster than the wave's frequency. The field lines end on the wall, in keeping with $\nabla\cdot E=\rho/\epsilon_0$: there is a time varying charge density in the walls.

You may even want to try graphing some of those field lines: for the magnetic field for example, the last two equations tell you that $\frac{H_y}{H_x} = \frac{m\,b}{n\,a}\, \tan\left(\frac{m\,\pi\,x}{a}\right)\,\cot\left(\frac{n\,\pi\,y}{b}\right)$. $\frac{H_y}{H_x}$ defines the direction of the tangent to the field line, so you have a differential equation:

$$\frac{\mathrm{d}\,y}{\mathrm{d}\,x}=\frac{m\,b}{n\,a}\, \tan\left(\frac{m\,\pi\,x}{a}\right)\,\cot\left(\frac{n\,\pi\,y}{b}\right)$$

which is readily integrable and which you can plot in something like Mathematica.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.