4
$\begingroup$

For a homework question, we are given the metric $$ds^2=dt^2-\frac{2m}{F}dr^2-F^2d\Omega^2\ ,$$ where F is some nasty function of $r$ and $t$. We're asked to then show that this satisfies the Field Equations.

I know exactly how to proceed with this computation, but the algebra is so annoying and I'm so likely to make mistakes that I wondered if there was a way to obtain the Ricci tensor from a spherically symmetric spacetime without doing a whole bunch of pointless computation? For instance, our prof has posted such formulae for a Riemann Tensor: $$R_{2323}=\frac{\sin^2{\theta}}{4ab}(c^2_{r}a-c^2_{t}b-4abc)$$ where the subscripts denote partial differentiation and the metric has the form $$ds^2=a(r,t)dt^2-b(r,t)dr^2-c(r,t)d\Omega^2\ .$$ Is there a resource that shows how to now go from the Riemann to the Ricci tensor? Or still better, formulae that give the Ricci tensor directly for a general spherically symmetric metric?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This link might be of help - arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9602015 $\endgroup$ – Prahar Nov 27 '14 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ I haven't got time to do it manually, but I've computed the Ricci tensor and scalar using Mathematica, and both are non-zero for a generic $F(r,t)$, so in general it's not a solution to the vacuum Einstein field equations. $\endgroup$ – JamalS Nov 27 '14 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ If you are familiar with differential forms from differential geometry, I highly recommend the Cartan method - it's much faster than doing the whole computation directly. $\endgroup$ – JamalS Nov 27 '14 at 12:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar Thank you for the link! This is exactly the kind of thing I was looking for. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Nov 28 '14 at 2:49
  • $\begingroup$ @JamalS I haven't seen the Cartan method before, but I looked it up and I think it's definitely worth learning. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Nov 28 '14 at 2:50
2
$\begingroup$

I take the metric in the question to mean explicitly,

$$ds^2 = dt^2 - \frac{2m}{F(t,r)}dr^2-F(t,r)^2 \left( d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta\, d\phi^2\right).$$

Computing the curvature tediously, one finds the Einstein tensor $G_{ab}=R_{ab}-\frac12 g_{ab}R$ has eight non-vanishing components. For example, from the field equations, one finds,

$$T_{00} = \frac{m - F(t,r)F_r(t,r)^2 - F(t,r)^2 F_{rr}(t,r)}{8\pi G m \, F(t,r)^2}.$$

If one wants the metric to satisfy the vacuum field equations, one can explicitly solve $T_{00}=0$, but there are further constraints on $F(t,r)$ from the rest of the components of $T_{ab}$ - I have not been able to explicitly prove yet whether this system can be solved to yield a $F(t,r)$ for which the metric is a vacuum solution.

However, demoting $F(t,r)$ to $F(r)$ to make the system somewhat simpler, there certainly is a choice of $F(r)$ for which the metric is a vacuum solution, e.g.

$$F(r) = \left[ \frac32 \left( \pm \sqrt{2m}r + c\right)\right]^{2/3}$$

for $c\in\mathbb R$, which certainly makes me suspect there are time-dependent $F(t,r)$ for which the metric is a vacuum solution as well.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.