3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove the commutation relations between the creation and annihilation operators in field theory. I was already able to show that $[a_k, a_q^\dagger]=i\delta(k-q)$. I want to show that $[a_k^\dagger, a_q^\dagger]=0,$ but I am stuck on the last step. I think my confusion has to do with interpreting the delta function and I was hoping someone can help me out. So far I have shown that

$$a_k^\dagger = \int \! d^3\!x \: e^{-ikx}\left[ \sqrt{\frac{E_k}{2}} \phi(x) - i \sqrt{\frac{1}{2E_k}} \pi(x) \right],$$

where $\phi(x)$ and $\pi(x)$ are the field and conjugate momentum respectively. Based on this I was able to show that

$$[a_k^\dagger, a_q^\dagger]=\int \! d^3y \: d^3x \: e^{-i(kx+qy)} \left[ -i \sqrt{\frac{E_k}{E_q}} [\phi(x), \pi(y)] + i \sqrt{\frac{E_q}{E_k}} [\phi(y),\pi(x)] \right].$$

Using the commutation relation $[\phi(x), \pi(y)]=i \delta^3(x-y)$ this becomes

$$[a_k^\dagger, a_q^\dagger]=\int \! d^3y \: e^{-i (k+q) y} \left[ \sqrt{\frac{E_k}{E_q}} -\sqrt{\frac{E_q}{E_k}} \right].$$

And I believe the integral over y gives us a delta function. If I have done everything correctly then this should be

$$[a_k^\dagger, a_q^\dagger]=\delta^3(k+q) \left[ \sqrt{\frac{E_k}{E_q}} -\sqrt{\frac{E_q}{E_k}} \right].$$

Since I already know the commutation relations I know that the final expression should equal zero for any arbitrary value of $k$ and $q$. But my final expression doesn't really say that for $k=-q$. I don't really understand where this discrepancy is coming from, though. Is there some way to interpret this delta function (i.e. is $\infty \cdot 0=0$?) that I'm not understanding or have I made a computational error somewhere?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ What happens to the expression in the brackets when $k=-q$...? $\endgroup$ – Nephente Nov 25 '14 at 8:50
  • $\begingroup$ I guess this is what I'm having a hard time interpreting. You get ∞⋅0, which I guess equals zero, but I'm not sure why. I edited the question to clarify what I'm asking. $\endgroup$ – Dargscisyhp Nov 26 '14 at 5:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Keep in mind $\int \delta(x-a) f(x) = f(a)$. To calculate anything physical you'll be integrating over this delta function, and the result will be zero. $\endgroup$ – adipy Nov 26 '14 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ Another way to see it is to remember that $x\delta(x)=0$ (since when applied on any test-function, this will always give zero). $\endgroup$ – Adam Nov 26 '14 at 21:15
2
$\begingroup$

You can think of the continuos formalism as being the limiting case of the discrete-momentum one: if the momentum is taken as a discrete variable (which amounts to constraining the particles to be in some finite volume $V$) the fourier expansion of the (real, scalar) field is: $$ \tag{1} \varphi(x) = \sum_{\textbf{k}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2V \omega_{\textbf{k}}}} \left( a_\textbf{k} e^{-ikx} + a_\textbf{k}^\dagger e^{ikx} \right) $$ From this you can verify (similarly to what you did above) that $$ \tag{2} [a_k,a_q^\dagger] = \delta_{k,q}, \qquad [a_k,a_q] = 0 = [a_k^\dagger,a_q^\dagger].$$ this times without the problems arising from handling the continuous Dirac's delta functions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.