Superposition and simultaneous observation Trying to understand superposition.
Ok, so double slit experiment. The multiple paths the particle simultaneously travels interfere with each other but as it is absorbed, it chooses one "actual" location, thus the energy level remains the same.
Can the particle can only interact in a superposed manner with itself, because if it interacted with something else it would be "observed" and thus have to pick one thing to interact with, or can the particle manage to interact with two things simultaneously?
 A: The observations at the level of particles, microscopic world of nanometer dimensions, have been fitted and understood with quantum mechanics, and predictions for new observations are very successful with this theory. The microcosm framework is quantum mechanical.
Quantum mechanics depends on a set of postulates for the solutions of quantum mechanical equations. The solutions are complex valued functions, the observables are real numbers. The postulates connect the mathematical solutions to the real measurements by stating that it is the complex conjugate squared of the wave function, a real number, which is relevant to measurements and gives the probability of observing a particle at a specific space time point.
Superposition of wave functions means that there will be interference terms which are due to the mathematical structure of the proposed solution. Superposition is not interaction. It is addition of probabilities following the complex numbers algebra, to get a new wavefunction .
This is clear in laser beam interference experiments, where the beams cross each other without interacting ( two photon interference is very improbable) when not measured but at the a screen   interference is seen.
With this background:

Ok, so double slit experiment. The multiple paths the particle simultaneously travels interfere with each other but as it is absorbed, it chooses one "actual" location, thus the energy level remains the same. 

A description with multiple paths is a mathematical model to get at the probability distribution. Particles are point particles in the standard model of elementary particle physics. They are not spread out all over the available space for the interaction. It is only the probability of  interaction that is varying. When detected particles are consistent with being a point.
The screen shows the solution of the quantum mechanical equations for the experiment "particle scattering off two slits" This is one complex  sinusoidal function which squared due to the boundary conditions will give the interference pattern. It is a one particle wave function ( in contrast with the photons of the laser light above) because the interference pattern builds up one particle at a time too.. It builds a probability distribution. The probability that the particle passes through one of the slits and hits the screen has a sinusoidal distribution which shows interference effects. 

double slit experiment one electron at a time.

Can the particle only interact in a superposed manner with itself, because if it interacted with something else it would be "observed" and thus have to pick one thing to interact with,

As explained above, superposition is not interaction. In the case of the single particle scattering off the slits, it is the boundary conditions that determine the wavefunction and the properties which will be manifested by accumulating measurements with the same boundary conditions ( momentum, geometry of  slits).

or can the particle manage to interact with two things simultaneously?

No, in the existing theory, described with Feynman diagrams, a particle interacts with one particle or field at a time.  
A: There are several confusing things in this question:
1) "The multiple paths the particle simultaneously travels interfere with each other..."
It's not the paths that interfere, when these paths cross one another, i.e. the wave-packet on one path and the wave-packet on the other path pass through the same region at the SAME TIME.
2) "but as it is absorbed, it chooses one 'actual' location".
WHO chooses? What we find is that a given place on the photographic plate was impressed. We don't know WHICH participant in this game chooses that place, the particle, the material on the photographic plate, or some other participant obscure to us.
3) Observation and interaction are different things. 
For observing the particle we need a macroscopic recording, we cannot see the quantum particle directly. Such a recording implies that we bring the particle in contact with a material that contains an enormous number of particles, for which we cannot write a wave-function because we cannot keep track of their evolution. Part of the particles in a   measurement apparatus are merely photons that fly into, or come from the environment.
On the other hand, we can bring our particle to interact with another particle or with more particles. As long as we can follow their behavior we can write the wave-function, but unfortunately, we can't say that we made a measurement, e.g. a recording of which path took our particle.
Good luck!
