As everyone knows, when the big bang happened, the universe expanded at an unbelievable rate and this was called the inflationary epoch (or more popularly cosmological inflation) which lasted for about $10^-$$^3$$^4$ seconds. But after that, the rate of expansion suddenly reduced and is now gradually increasing. Can someone tell me what is the probable reason or the resistive force that caused expansion to slow down greatly after the big bang?

The question is based on the simple fact that expansion could not have slowed down if there was no resistive force acting or more simply inertia of motion.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ As everyone knows... Inflation is an unproved theory. There is no direct evidence for it yet. $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Nov 14, 2014 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ As everyone knows... ... there is no such thing as Inflation. It is a magical term with zero evidence. Might as well say, as everyone knows, the Big Bang worked by magic... $\endgroup$ Apr 26, 2015 at 6:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In response to the two comments above, there is a large amount of evidence supporting "inflation" theory, not the least of which is the microwave background variations. Sure it could be wrong, but so could general relativity or any other model of the universe. The questioner wants to know what the theory "predicts" to be the reason for the slow down. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2019 at 17:55

2 Answers 2


Here is the scenario from wikipedia

According to inflation theory, the inflaton is a scalar field that is responsible for cosmic inflation in the very early universe. A quantized particle for this field is expected, similar to other quantum fields, called an inflaton. The field provides a mechanism by which a period of rapid expansion from 10^−35 to 10^−34 seconds after the initial expansion can be generated, forming the universe.

Note that before 10^-35 seconds the inflation is the steady one from the original Big Bang.

The basic process of inflation consists of three steps:

Prior to the expansion period, the inflaton field was at a higher-energy state. Random quantum fluctuations triggered a phase transition whereby the inflaton field released its potential energy as matter and radiation as it settled to its lowest-energy state.

the rapid inflation results in the increase of kinetic energy as the inflaton field settled to its lower energy level

This action generated a repulsive force that drove the portion of the universe that is observable to us today to expand from approximately 10^−50 metres in radius at 10^−35 seconds to almost 1 metre in radius at 10^−34 seconds.

So it is the time necessary for the inflaton field to fall from the higher to the lower energy level.

The model continues here

At the end of the early universe's inflationary period, all the matter and energy in the universe was set on an inertial trajectory consistent with the equivalence principle and Einstein's general theory of relativity and this is when the precise and regular form of the universe's expansion had its origin (that is, matter in the universe is separating because it was separating in the past due to the inflaton field).

According to measurements, the universe's expansion rate was decelerating until about 5 billion years ago due to the gravitational attraction of the matter content of the universe,

So it is the gravitational attraction that takes over once the inflaton field is at its lowest energy state.A lot of kinetic energy ended up as potential gravitational balancing the expansion

after which time the expansion began accelerating.

and is currently doing so.

In order to explain the acceleration physicists have postulated the existence of dark energy which appears in the simplest theoretical models as a cosmological constant. According to the simplest extrapolation of the currently-favored cosmological model (known as "ΛCDM"), this acceleration becomes more dominant into the future.

As I understand it the subject is still under research, theoretically and experimentally

  • $\begingroup$ It expanded from 10-50 metres to 1 metre? Surely that's backward. $\endgroup$ Nov 14, 2014 at 18:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @zibadawatimmy copy does not copy correctly powers. it is 10^-50 $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Nov 14, 2014 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see. You can edit latex/mathjax into quoted text and it will display appropriately, if you'd like to improve readability. $\endgroup$ Nov 14, 2014 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ You are using "Inflation" to argue against this which is incorrect because inflation itself is false and defies the basic fundamental laws of General Relativity. Matter cannot move faster than the speed of light. Using "Inflation" is just jibber-jabber, like saying, "because of a magical force that defied all the laws of physics, a magical force that cannot be proven nor tested." So you said a lot of words but didn't even begin to answer the question. $\endgroup$ Apr 26, 2015 at 6:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JackR.Woods gravitational waves are the result of space distortions, not the cause, so they cannot limit the velocity of space distortions. As I said, it is a model that is still researched both theoretically and experimentally. At the moment it fits the data, but we cannot forget that gravity has not been definitively quantized, so surprises may be ahead of how the model develops. $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Feb 11, 2019 at 18:33

If you take and measure the accelerated expansion of space occurring between a random pair of galaxies, say around 20 to 30 million light years away from us, then multiply that acceleration by 13.8 billion years, the age of the universe. Now, compare the answer to the distance they are currently apart. The numbers don't match. The two galaxies don't actually merge onto a single point, IE big bang. They would still be over 2 million light years apart, even after the space between them accelerated between 9% to 11% in the last few years. Remember, if we were to go backwards in time then the acceleration would decelerate, making the distance they potentially traveled in 13.8 billion years much less. The two galaxies still would have never occupied the same spot. Hence no big bang. Besides, cosmological inflation actually violates the 3rd law of motion, once in motion always in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. If inflation happened it would not stop. Galaxies would not have formed if rapid inflation occurred right after a big bang. If the amount of energy and mass in the singularity was unable to prevent the big bang from happening then it wouldn't be enough to ever slow down the theorized inflation. There has to be a better explanation. Future observations by the infrared telescope James Webb should uncover the solutions to every unexplained mystery, even how and when the universe began. Go JWST.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.