A 10 kg monkey climbs up a massless rope that runs over a frictionless tree limb and back down to a 15 kg package on the ground. Part a) What is the magnitude of the least acceleration the monkey must have if it is to lift the package off the ground.
Professor's solution:
The force the monkey pulls downward on the rope has magnitude F. According to Newton’s third law, the rope pulls upward on the monkey with a force of the same magnitude, so Newton’s second law for forces acting on the monkey leads to eq(1)
$$F-m_mg=m_ma_m$$ where $m_m$ is the mass of the monkey and $a_m$ is its acceleration. Since the rope is massless $F = T$ is the tension in the rope. The rope pulls upward on the package with a force of magnitude F, so Newton’s second law for the package is $$F+F_N -m_g=m_pa_p$$ where $m_p$ is the mass of the package, $a_p$ is its acceleration, and $F_N$ is the normal force exerted by the ground on it. Now, if F is the minimum force required to lift the package, then
$$ F_N = 0~\text{ and }~a_p = 0$$ According to the second law equation for the package, this means $$F = m_pg$$ Substituting $m_pg$ for $F$ in the equation for the monkey, we solve for $a_m$:
$$a=\frac{F-m_mg}{m_m}=\frac{(m_p-m_m)g}{m_m} = 4.9 m/s^2$$
Two questions on this:
Why in the solution given above in eq(1) $F$ has a positive sign and the $m_mg$ has a negative one, shouldn't it be the other way round since the motion is anticlockwise so we take weight to be in the direction of motion this holding a positive sign and force a negative sign?
The other thing is it really that $T=F$, I thought that to find the acceleration, we shouldn't worry about tension because it will cancel anyway? Or is the F here a pulling force like any pulling force in normal life? One more thing why did he consider $a_p$ zero?