2
$\begingroup$

I heard in a conference that gravity forbids to construct local gauge invariants like $\mathrm{Tr}\left\{−\frac{1}{4} F_{μν}^{a}F_{a}^{μν}\right\}$ and only allows non-local gauge invariant quantities like Wilson Loops: $\mathrm{Tr}\mathcal{P}\exp\left[\oint_{\gamma} A^{a}dx_{a}\right]$. Could someone explain me where does it come from?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

General coordinate invariance lets you arbitrarily set the values of the metric and it's first derivative at any one point--http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_coordinates . Since you can do this, constructions like the maxwell term you describe above will be necessarily coordinate-dependent, and thus, not local observables.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry but it still isn't clear for me, if I build a theory containing general coordinate invariance and U(1) local gauge symmetry, so a "world" containing gravity and electromagnetism, and I minimally couple the gauge boson to gravity, ie his kinetic term is $-\frac14 F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}$ with $F_{\mu\nu} = D_{\mu}A_{\nu} - D_{\nu}A_{\mu}$ where $D$ is the covariant derivative associated with coordinate-diffeomorphisms, so this term is a scalar regarding both gauge and coordinate transformations; thus a good candidate for a local observable. $\endgroup$ – toot Sep 11 '11 at 13:49
  • $\begingroup$ ok my bad, I just read Lubos's answer (physics.stackexchange.com/questions/4359/…) and it now clear for me. Thanks Jerry (and Lubos). ;) $\endgroup$ – toot Sep 11 '11 at 14:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.