6
$\begingroup$

Consider maps $t\mapsto x^i(t)$ from circle to some Riemannian (spin) manifold and Lagrangian

$$ \mathcal L = \frac12 g_{ij}(x) \partial_t x^i \partial_t x^j + \frac12 g_{ij} \psi^j \left(\delta^i_k \partial_t + \Gamma^i_{mk} \partial_t x^m\right)\psi^k, \tag{1}$$

where $\psi^k$ are real Grassmann variables. This is supersymmetric under

$$ \delta x^i =\epsilon \psi^i, \qquad \delta\psi^i=\epsilon \partial_t x^i.\tag{2}$$

We want to compute

$$ \operatorname{Tr}(-)^Fe^{-\beta H}=\int_\text{periodic}[dx][d\psi] \exp \left(-\int_0^\beta dt \mathcal L\right)\tag{3}$$

in the limit $\beta \to 0$.

My question is: to see that the lagrangian for quadratic fluctuations around constant configurations

$$\xi^i=x^i -x^i_0, \qquad\eta^i=\psi^i-\psi^i_0,\tag{4}$$

(namely the one surviving in $\beta \to 0$ limit) is

$$ \mathcal L^{(2)}=\frac12 g_{ij}(x_0) \partial_t \xi^i \partial_t \xi^j - \frac14 R_{ijkl}\xi^i\partial_t\xi^j \psi_0^k\psi_0^l +\frac{i}2\eta^a\partial_t\eta^a.\tag{5}$$

What are the right substitutions to make, besides using Riemann normal coordinates and vielbein $e_i^a e_j^b \eta_{ab}=g_{ij}$?

References: Friedan and Windey or Alvarez-Gaume'.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$
  1. OP wants to evaluate the index $$ {\rm Tr}(-)^F e^{-\beta H}=\int_{PBC}\![d\phi]\int_{PBC}[d\psi]~ e^{-S_E[\phi,\psi]},\tag{2.5} $$ in Ref. 1 with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) for both the boson $\phi\equiv x$ and the fermion $\psi$. Hence the corresponding Fourier components are labelled by integers$^1$ $n\in\mathbb{Z}$. One may argue that (2.5) does not depend on $\beta$, so that one may consider the $\beta\to 0^+$ limit.

  2. Before discussing OP's model with 1 real fermion, we first discuss a model with 2 real fermions $\psi_1^j$ and $\psi_2^j$, or equivalently, 1 complex fermion $\psi^j=(\psi_1^j+i\psi_2^j)/\sqrt{2}$. Following Ref. 2, The Minkowski Lagrangian reads$^2$ $$ L_M~=~ \frac{1}{2}g_{ij}(x)\dot{x}^i\dot{x}^j +\frac{i}{2}\sum_{\alpha\in\{1,2\}}\psi^i_{\alpha} g_{ij}(x) \left(\dot{\psi}^j_{\alpha}+\dot{x}^m\Gamma^j_{mk}(x)\psi^k_{\alpha}\right) $$ $$ +\frac{1}{4}R_{ijk\ell}(x)\psi^i_1\psi^j_1\psi^k_2\psi^{\ell}_2\tag{74}$$ with real fermions in Ref. 2, or equivalently $$ L_M~=~ \frac{1}{2}g_{ij}(\phi)\dot{\phi}^i\dot{\phi}^j +i\psi^{\ast i} g_{ij}(\phi) \frac{D\psi^j}{dt} -\frac{1}{4}R_{ijk\ell}(\phi)\psi^{\ast i}\psi^{\ast j}\psi^k\psi^{\ell}\tag{4.1}$$ with complex fermions in Ref. 1. We next Wick rotate $\tau=it$. The Euclidean action is $$S_E~=~\int_0^{\beta} d\tau ~ L_E.$$ Next split an arbitrary virtual path $(x,\psi)$ into zeromodes and non-constant modes: $$x^i(\tau)~=~x^i_0 +\xi^i(\tau), \qquad \psi^j_{\alpha}(\tau)~=~\psi^j_{\alpha 0}+\eta^j_{\alpha}(\tau). $$ The non-constant modes $(\xi,\eta)$ have Fourier components labelled by non-zero integers $n\in\mathbb{Z}\backslash\{0\}$. Let us rescale from old unprimed variables to new primed variables $$ \tau~=~ \beta\tau^{\prime},\qquad L_E~=~ \frac{L^{\prime}_E}{\beta},\qquad S_E~=~ S^{\prime}_E, \qquad g_{ij}~=~ g^{\prime}_{ij}, $$ $$ x^i_0~=~ x^{i\prime}_0,\qquad \xi^i~=~ \sqrt{\beta}\xi^{i\prime},\qquad \psi^i_{\alpha 0} ~=~\frac{\psi^{i\prime}_{\alpha 0}}{\beta^{1/4}},\qquad \eta^i_{\alpha}~=~ \eta^{i\prime}_{\alpha}.$$ One may argue that the total path integral (super)Jacobian of this transformation is precisely $1$, e.g. via zeta-function regularization $$\prod_{n\in\mathbb{Z}} \sqrt{\beta} ~=~1. $$ We drop the primes from the notation from now on. Only quadratic terms in $(\xi,\eta)$ survive in the Euclidean Lagrangian $$ L^{(2)}_E~=~ \frac{1}{2}g_{ij}(x_0)\dot{\xi}^i\dot{\xi}^j +\eta^{\ast i} g_{ij}(x_0)\dot{\eta}^j -\frac{1}{4}R_{ijk\ell}(x_0)\psi^{\ast i}_0\psi^{\ast j}_0\psi^k_0\psi^{\ell}_0 +{\cal O}(\beta). $$ The term $\psi^{\ast i}_0 g_{ij}(x_0)\dot{\eta}^j$ vanishes identically because of PBC.

    The above scaling procedure $\beta\to 0^+$ is an example of localization to constant paths $$(x^i(\tau),\psi^j_{\alpha}(\tau))~\longrightarrow~ (x^i_0,\psi^j_{\alpha 0})$$ in a path integral. The full path integral is given by the Duistermaat-Heckman formula and the method of steepest descent for the Euclidean signature; or equivalently, the WKB stationary phase formula for Minkowski signature, cf. Refs. 4-5.

    The fermionic d.o.f. mimic the de Rham complex. One may show that the Witten index (2.5) becomes the Euler characteristics, cf. the Chern-Gauss-Bonnet theorem, and eq. (4.3) in Ref. 1. $\Box$

  3. We now return to OP's question. OP's Euclidean Lagrangian [which corresponds to eq. (73) in Ref. 2] is obtained by imposing the additional condition $$\psi_1^i~=~\psi_2^i~=~\psi^i/\sqrt{2}.$$ The quartic curvature term disappears by symmetry. The rescaling from old unprimed variables to new primed variables now reads $$ \tau~=~ \beta\tau^{\prime},\qquad L_E~=~ \frac{L^{\prime}_E}{\beta},\qquad S_E~=~ S^{\prime}_E, \qquad g_{ij}~=~ g^{\prime}_{ij}, $$ $$ x^i_0~=~ x^{i\prime}_0,\qquad \xi^i~=~ \sqrt{\beta}\xi^{i\prime},\qquad \psi^i_0 ~=~\frac{\psi^{i\prime}_0}{\sqrt{\beta}},\qquad \eta^i~=~ \eta^{i\prime}.$$ One may argue that the total path integral (super)Jacobian of this transformation is still precisely $1$. Only quadratic terms in $(\xi,\eta)$ survive in the Euclidean Lagrangian $$ L^{(2)}_E~=~ \frac{1}{2}g_{ij}(x_0)\dot{\xi}^i\dot{\xi}^j -\frac{1}{4}R_{ijab}(x_0)\psi^a_0\psi^b_0\xi^i\dot{\xi}^j+\frac{1}{2}\eta^a \dot{\eta}^a+{\cal O}(\beta).\tag{78}$$ cf. Ref. 2. Here $a,b$ are flat indices (aka. as vielbein indices). The calculation (78) is simplified by using Riemann normal coordinates, cf. $$ \Gamma^{k}_{ij}(x)~\sim~ \frac{1}{2} R^k{}_{i\ell j}(x_0) \xi^{\ell} \tag{5.10} $$ in Ref. 3.

    The fermions now form a Clifford algebra, so that the index (2.5) becomes the Dirac/A-roof genus, cf. eqs. (79)-(81) in Ref. 2. $\Box$

References:

  1. L. Alvarez-Gaume, Supersymmetry and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, Comm. Math. Phys. 90 (1983) 161.

  2. L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, Gravitational Anomalies, Nucl.Phys. B234 (1984) 269.

  3. D. Friedan and P. Windey, Supersymmetric Derivation of the Atiyah-Singer Index and the Chiral Anomaly, Nucl.Phys. B235 (1984) 395.

  4. R.J. Szabo, Equivariant Localization of Path Integrals, hep-th/9608068.

  5. S. Cordes, G. Moore and S. Ramgoolam, Lectures on 2D Yang-Mills Theory, Equivariant Cohomology and Topological Field Theories, hep-th/9411210; Chapter 12.

  6. H. Oogori, Lecture 8: Supersymmetry and index theorems.

--

$^1$ Anti-periodic boundary conditions (ABC) corresponds to half-integer modes.

$^2$ We have corrected some index typos in eq. (74) of Ref. 2. Another typo in Ref. 2 is that $\tau$ in eq. (74) should be $t$. Later Ref. 2 forgets to remove an $i$ in front of the Wick-rotated kinetic term for the fermions in eq. (78).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for the nice answer; 1. is it also possible to see this using the lagrangian I write? 2. can you explain how you get 1 for the determinant of transformation: $\xi$ cancels $\psi_2$, but what happens for finite dimensional $\psi_0$? 3. I'm not sure I understand the rescalings: are you making a transformation, say, $\xi(\tau) = \sqrt{\beta}\xi'(\tau')$, and then explicitely rescaling the lagrangian? $\endgroup$ – jj_p Nov 11 '14 at 14:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 1. Yes. See update. 2. See update. 3. Yes. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic May 20 '19 at 11:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.