What is the relationship between redshift and conformal time ?

For example in a paper i found:

taking $z_e = 3234 $ at the time of radiaton-matter equality yields the conformal time $\frac{\eta_e}{\eta_0} = 0.007$ and taking $z_E=0.39$ at matter-$\Lambda$ equality yields $\frac{\eta_E}{\eta_0}=0.894$ and setting redshift at decoupling $z_d=1089$ yields $\frac{\eta_d}{\eta_0} = 0.0195$ where $\eta_0$ is the present decoupling time.

Further some cosmological parameters are given as : $\Omega_r = 8.36 \times 10^{-5}, \Omega_m = \Omega_b + \Omega_{dm} = 0.044 +0.226, \Omega_\Lambda = 0.73, H_0=0.72$

Now how can i calculate all those $\eta_e, \eta_E, \eta_d, \eta_0$ from given redshift values and/or above parameters ? I searched whole of my text books trying to find an explicit relation for conformal time $\eta$ but all i got was $ \mathrm{d}t=a(t)\mathrm{d}\eta$. Any help would be very helpful.

  • $\begingroup$ Have you taken a look at this wikipedia page? $\endgroup$ – Danu Oct 29 '14 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ Well yeah. Including that link and almost everywhere, i find relations are given in terms of time "t" rather than conformal time. Also I can find redshift from given fractional density parameters but from redshift to conformal time ... no idea till now. $\endgroup$ – cmbfast Oct 29 '14 at 9:12

As you state, conformal time is defined as $$ \eta(t) = \int_0^t\frac{\text{d}t'}{a(t')}. $$ Using $$ \dot{a} = \frac{\text{d}a}{\text{d}t}, $$ this can be written in the form $$ \eta(a) = \int_0^a\frac{\text{d}a}{a\dot{a}} = \int_0^a\frac{\text{d}a}{a^2H(a)}, $$ with $$ H(a) = \frac{\dot{a}}{a} = H_0\sqrt{\Omega_{R,0}\,a^{-4} + \Omega_{M,0}\,a^{-3} + \Omega_{K,0}\,a^{-2} + \Omega_{\Lambda,0}}. $$ The scale factor $a$ is related to the redshift as $$ 1 + z = \frac{1}{a}, $$ so that $$ \eta(z) = \frac{1}{H_0}\int_0^{1/(1+z)}\frac{\text{d}a}{\sqrt{\Omega_{R,0} + \Omega_{M,0}\,a + \Omega_{K,0}\,a^2 + \Omega_{\Lambda,0}\,a^4}}. $$ Basically, the conformal time is equal to the distance of the particle horizon, divided by $c$ (see this post for more info). $\eta_0$ refers to the current conformal age of the universe.


I just checked the values that you posted with my own cosmology calculator. I get $$ \eta_0 = 45.93\;\text{Gigayears} $$ for the current conformal age of the universe, and $$ \begin{align} z_e &= 3234,& a_e &= 0.000309,& t_e &= 5.54\times 10^{-5}\;\text{Gy},&\eta_e &= 0.3804\;\text{Gy},\\ z_E &= 0.39,& a_E &= 0.719,& t_E &= 9.359\;\text{Gy},& \eta_E &= 41.08\;\text{Gy},\\ z_d &= 1089,& a_d &= 0000917,& t_d &= 0.00037\;\text{Gy},& \eta_d &= 0.911\;\text{Gy}, \end{align} $$ so that $$ \frac{\eta_e}{\eta_0} = 0.00828,\quad \frac{\eta_E}{\eta_0} = 0.894,\quad \frac{\eta_d}{\eta_0} = 0.0198. $$ So my results are almost the same, but there's a small discrepancy. Apparently there's a small numerical error somewhere.

  • $\begingroup$ Wow thanks indeed for clear answer and the link as well ! $\endgroup$ – cmbfast Oct 29 '14 at 9:55
  • $\begingroup$ wait !! sorry for being lame here but I put the values of $z$ and all $\Omega$s in the above equation but unable to get values as you obtained. I searched few web based cosmology calculators but they dont have $\eta$. Where did i go wrong ? $\endgroup$ – cmbfast Oct 29 '14 at 10:54
  • $\begingroup$ @cmbfast Did you convert $H_0^{-1}$ into years? $\endgroup$ – Pulsar Oct 29 '14 at 11:04
  • $\begingroup$ Well yeah just figured that and corrected it and almost got your answers for 1st and last case. However putting z=0.39 is giving a negative $\eta$ . $\endgroup$ – cmbfast Oct 29 '14 at 11:17
  • $\begingroup$ @cmbfast Then there must be a bug in your program. The integral should always be positive. $\endgroup$ – Pulsar Oct 29 '14 at 11:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.