The Navier-Stokes equation is

$$\rho \dfrac{D\mathbf{u}}{Dt} = -\nabla p+(\lambda+\mu)\nabla(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u})+\mu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}$$

Then if the flow is incomprresible, and the fluid is homogenous ($\rho$ is constant in space) then $\rho$ will be constant in time and $\rho = \rho_0$ so that we can write this as

$$\rho_0 \dfrac{D\mathbf{u}}{Dt} = - \nabla p + \mu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}$$

From this we can introduce numbers $U$ and $L$ in order to write $\bar{x}_i = x_i/L$ and $\bar{\mathbf{u}} = \mathbf{u}/U$ so that $\bar{t} = t/T$ where $T = L/U$. Then we obtain the equation

$$\dfrac{\partial \bar{\mathbf{u}}}{\partial \bar{t}} + (\bar{\mathbf{u}}\cdot \nabla)\bar{\mathbf{u}} = -\nabla \bar{p} + \dfrac{1}{R}\nabla^2\bar{\mathbf{u}}$$

Where $R = LU/\nu$ is the Reynolds number. That's fine, but what's the motivation to write the equation like that? What do we gain from just changing the coordinates by rescaling them? Many books says that the importance of the Reynolds number comes from writing the equation with dimensionless quantities, but why is that?

  • $\begingroup$ I don't have time to write up a full answer right now, but when you write an equation in terms of dimensionless quantities, the relative importance of each part of the equation becomes immediately clear. For example if $R\gg1$, then the second term on the right hand side becomes exceedingly insignificant as compared to the other terms. $\endgroup$
    – Wouter
    Oct 27, 2014 at 13:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dimensionless quantities make it easier to define scales in some cases, such as this one, which allows us to derive physical meaning more easily. Also, they are especially suited for numerical simulations if the quantities have extreme values, because fast computer arithmetic has finite precision. $\endgroup$
    – auxsvr
    Oct 27, 2014 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ My answer here might be useful: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/138598/… $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    Nov 24, 2014 at 0:00

1 Answer 1


Every time, when you deal with differential equations, the first step is to put it into dimensionless form. There are more reasons for that. First, "small" and "large" has no meaning in dimensional forms, since you can always change the system of units. Second, nature knows no units.

Now, when there is no exact solution (this is often the case), you can neglect terms, if they are small, and you get an approximation to your problem. This leads us to perturbation theory. For instance, you get Stokes flow when the Reynolds number is much smaller than unity, and the linear viscous terms are much larger than the non-linear terms, therefore you can find asymptotic solutions for complex problems.

In $\Pi$-theorem you can also derive relationships based on units of quantities.

In many cases of fluid dynamics, relationships have only dimensional reasons.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.