1
$\begingroup$

Imagine I have an electric field $E$ created due to some free charges. Then I introduce a dielectric material somewhere. What confuses me is the polarization field $P$, which is now proportional to the original $E$ within the dielectric. Does this new field contribute to the total electric field outside of the dielectric? How will the force on a test charge near the dielectric change?

I know with $D=E + 4\pi P$, that the maxwell equation $\operatorname{div}(D) = 4\pi\cdot \rho$ with $\rho$ being the free charge density must be satisfied, but what boundary conditions have I added to calculate $D$?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Polarization P is caused by the presence of E and a dielectric material. It does not "add" to E, instead it adds to flux D. It does not relate to free charges. And the relationship is

$$ D = \epsilon_0 E + P. $$

Polarization reflects what happens to the bound charge-pairs in said dielectric (i.e. the amount the charge-pair separate with applied electric field). By virtue of the separation of the charge-pairs, there is a localized E field created, which distort E locally but since net charge of each pair is still 0, it does not add E globally, And it does not affect D outside the material.

One encounters P in the simple and most common case of linear dielectrics, as contributing to the permittivity. That is,

$$ D = \epsilon_0 E + \epsilon_0\chi E = \epsilon_0 (1+\chi) E. $$

where $\chi$ is called electric susceptibility.

Or to be more accurate, we create a mathematical constant, relative permittivity, i.e.

$$ \epsilon_r = \frac{P}{\epsilon_0 E} - 1, $$

so we can more easily relate P, E and D, vis a vis

$$ D = \epsilon_r \epsilon_0 E. $$

With regards to boundary condition, other than changing relative permittivity on either side of the boundary, there is no other consideration specific to P. All boundary condition of E and D still hold, regardless of P (or $\epsilon_r$).

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ my question is poorly phrase. what i was getting at was "if polarization adds linearly to D, how come adding a dielectric does not simply cause linearly increased D only within the dielectric)". the answer is because of the boundary conditions are on E and D (so my assumption in the question about P being proportional to the original E is completely wrong). In this case (e due to free charges) adding a dielectric does change E globally. i.e adding dielectric near a charge distribution warps the field $\endgroup$ – user3125280 Jun 4 '15 at 5:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.