2
$\begingroup$

Hydrogen fusion requires two hydrogen nuclei to get close enough (typically a few fm) to fuse. Much of the problem of creating a fusion reactor is overcoming the Coulomb repulsion between a pair of nuclei - the millions of degrees for Maxwellian distributions, the Bremstrahlung losses for inertial confinement.

If we could align the paths of two neutral Hydrogen atoms (of whichever isotopes), what would the repulsion look like between them as they approach collision? Obviously at long range there is negligable force as both are neutral. But as they approach each other, what happens to the electron distribution?

Intuitively, I expect a bonding cloud to form between the nuclei, and antibonding clouds beyond them. This would presumably attract at first until reaching the usual Hydrogen covalent bond length, after which the internuclear repulsion would increasingly dominate.

But how does that compare to bare ionic collision? How much lower is the potential barrier?

Obviously if it was significantly lower and we could somehow engineer the collision to achieve fusion, the cross section would be larger than ionic fusion, but how much?

Or would the barrier be just as high over the final few femtometers?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Your last sentence is exactly right: the energy cost for fusion is almost all in those last few femtometers, at which electronic effects are negligible. Although there is in principle a difference between colliding neutral atoms and nuclei, at the energies required for fusion the effect is tiny.

The energy differences associated with the presence, absence, arrangement, etc., of electrons are of order a few to a few tens of electron volts. One way to see this is to note that the size scale of the electron's wavefunction is of order the Bohr radius $a_0$, so the energy levels are of order $e^2/(4\pi\epsilon_0 a_0)$. But to get fusion to happen, as you say, you have to get the two protons to get within a fermi or so of each other. This length scale is something like $10^4$ to $10^5$ times smaller, so it involves energies that are larger by about the same factor -- MeV rather than eV.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.