5
$\begingroup$

I have a reasonable understanding of electron/positron annihilation, in that it is a collision between a pair of particles, one matter and one antimatter, that generally produces gamma radiation. However, I do not understand how this concept can be applied in astrophysics. In particular, what are annihilation lines?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Annihilation lines are emission spectral lines caused by the radiation emitted during an annihilation process. $\endgroup$ – lemon Sep 29 '14 at 10:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Have look at this article for a nice summary of the status of electron-positron annihilation line astronomy. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Sep 29 '14 at 11:12
7
$\begingroup$

Annihilation lines are spectral lines caused by the collision of particle-antiparticle pairs. In the case of $e^-e^+$, the emission is at 511 keV.

enter image description here
(source (arXiv link))

However, because it is caused by a collision of particles, rather than an absorption-emission of a photon, the peak is Doppler broadened. This means that the peak is spread out over a few keV, rather than a very sharp feature only at 511 keV, as an emission spectra would be. This effect is true for all annihilation lines, not just $e^-e^+$.

The galactic plane is a hotspot for the 511 keV line, but we're not really sure (as far as I know, at least) what is the source for the positrons.

enter image description here
(source)

Some heavy elements can produce positrons in supernova nucleosynthesis (e.g., the ${}^{56}{\rm Ni}$ chain). It's also possible that low-mass X-ray binaries can produce positrons via pair-production in outflows. Another possible source could be dark matter annihilation. As far as I know, no single source has declared as "the" source for galactic positrons.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could Hawking radiation from the supermassive black hole in the center be the cause of this hot spot? $\endgroup$ – John Dvorak Dec 20 '14 at 20:28
  • $\begingroup$ @JanDvorak: It's been proposed, but I don't believe that it's been widely accepted. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Dec 20 '14 at 20:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.