2
$\begingroup$

I've worked problems in the past in trig class concerning the effect of wind on the speed of a plane and it's flight path and was wondering if a similar thing occurs with a car.

First off, I'm pretty sure that if the speedometer reads 60 mph, even if the wind is blowing 15 mph in the same direction you will still have only traveled 60 miles at the end of an hour. My question is whether the car is traveling faster due to aid of the wind with respect to amount of work the engine has to perform and the gas consumed.

Is it correct to believe that the car is traveling 60 mph off of 45 mph effort, or, does it not work that way?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ When you say "gas consumed", do you mean per unit time or per distance traveled? $\endgroup$ – BowlOfRed Dec 12 '14 at 1:02
  • $\begingroup$ I meant per distance traveled. If I'm thinking correctly, I don't believe the consumption per unit time would be affected. $\endgroup$ – Electrondotts Dec 13 '14 at 8:00
0
$\begingroup$

No, while the work the engine does would be reduced by a tailwind, it would not be reduced to be equivalent to the relative speed travel.

Work $\ne$ Force

The work that the engine must exert to maintain speed is equal to the drag times the velocity. So let's look at the ideal situation where the only drag on the car was due to the wind. The drag on a car going 60 mph with a 15 mph tail wind would indeed be equivalent to the drag on the same car going 45 mph in still air. However, the work that the faster car would have to do to overcome this drag would still be $\frac43$ as much as the slower moving car.

Interestingly, this is not the case with the airplane. This is because while the car pushes on the ground, the airplane pushes on the air. When there is a tail wind, the airplane doesn't have to use as much energy to impart the same amount of momentum on the wind.

Other drag

The car engine must overcome other resistance forces besides air resistance. The rolling friction of the tires, the engine and drive train friction, and others will contribute to the amount of work the car must do to maintain speed. Many of these sources of friction increase with wheel speed, and thus velocity of the car, so it would not only take more work and power to maintain the 60 mph, but also more force.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The engine of the car provides power for acceleration and to overcome various forms of drag. Once the car has reached cruising speed, the only purpose of the engine is to overcome this drag.

A major source of drag at high travelling speeds is air resistance. Here, you are mostly correct that the drag will be similar to a car moving at 45 mph in calm conditions. But a wind usually isn't moving at exactly that same speed very close to the ground. There, the car will experience slightly higher drag than a similar car moving 45 in calm.

Other forms of drag exist within the car. All the moving parts experience friction and drag. The drive shaft, the transmission, the engine, and especially the tires all have losses. These losses will not be reduced by a tailwind.

So the car does get a benefit from the tailwind, but not as much as it would from driving 15mph more slowly.


This page suggests that a powerful sports car at 70mph may have rolling resistance of $1/2$ to $1/3$ the wind resistance. At slower speeds, the rolling resistance will be a larger fraction of total drag.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

Yes indeed. The wind does do some work in increasing the speed of the car. But in everyday situations, the speed of the wind and therefore the force exerted by it is just too less to do any work on the car. To get an idea as to how much work the wind is doing while the car moves, look at how much the car moves only due to the wind after you stop the car. The car almost doesn't move at all. Now the work done by the wind while the car moves is even lesser, as the relative velocity of the wind with respect to the car becomes lesser. Thus the car essentially moves only due to the work done by the engine.

In case of the wind blowing opposite the direction of the car; at high velocities of the car, the wind applies considerable force due to higher relative velocity. Thus you must take into account the work done by the wind in this case.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Implying that the wind forces on a stationary car are similar to the difference in drag on a fast moving car is misleading. Air resistance is proportional to the square of relative velocity, so if a 15 mph wind on a stationary car produced a 10 lb force. A 45 mph wind would produce a 90 lb force, and a 60 mph wind would produce a 160 lb force. So a tailwind of 15 mph on a 60 mph car would reduce drag force by 70 lb, quite a bit more than 10 lb. $\endgroup$ – Rick Dec 9 '14 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ Oh and if you look at work rather than force, it's a cubic relationship, so the difference is even more stark. Also, how can you say that the effect of wind will matter when it's a headwind, but not when it's a tailwind? Downvoted. $\endgroup$ – Rick Dec 11 '14 at 12:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.