0
$\begingroup$

I'm studying for my quantum mechanics test and I've stumbled on this problem. They want the expectation value of $\hat{n}$, $\langle \hat{n} \rangle$, with this given $\psi$ at $t=0$: $$ \lvert \psi(t=0) \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\lvert n \rangle + e^{i\phi} \lvert n+1 \rangle). $$ I know that I have to use $\langle \psi \vert \hat{n} \vert \psi \rangle$ but I'm not sure how to work with the $\lvert n \rangle$ bra's in the integral. How do they conjugate and can I write the $n$ in the middle as $\lvert n \rangle$?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Think of $\lvert \psi \rangle$ as being written $a \lvert n \rangle + b \lvert n{+}1 \rangle$ -- it is just a linear combination of $\lvert n \rangle$ and $\lvert n{+}1 \rangle$ with (possibly complex) coefficients $a$ and $b$. Converting from a ket to a bra (i.e., finding the dual) distributes over addition and scalar multiplication, and it complex-conjugates scalars. For example, $\lvert \psi \rangle = \lvert n \rangle \to \langle n \rvert = \langle \psi \rvert$ and $\lvert \psi \rangle = a \lvert n{+}1 \rangle \to a^* \langle n{+}1 \rvert = \langle \psi \rvert$.

Now one confusing point is that the index (or sometimes scalar) $n$ is different from the vector $\lvert n \rangle$ which is different from the operator $\hat{n}$. (Some authors omit that hat, possibly leading to more confusion.) $\hat{n}$ has as its eigenstates $\lvert k \rangle$ (switching to $k$ to avoid confusion), with eigenvalues $k$. That is, $\hat{n} \lvert k \rangle = k \lvert k \rangle$.

By the way, there's no actual integration required. When you evaluate things like $\langle n \vert \hat{n} \vert n{+}1 \rangle$, you're just finding the inner product of $\lvert n \rangle$ and $\hat{n} \lvert n{+}1 \rangle$, which, conveniently, involves no antidifferentiation at all. Sometimes you do things in the position or momentum basis, and only then do you have to resort to integrals.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But where do the bra's come from? I only have ket's now $\endgroup$ – Coolcrab Sep 20 '14 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Coolcrab By definition a bra is the conjugate transpose of a ket. $\endgroup$ – Bubble Sep 20 '14 at 20:34
  • $\begingroup$ So if $\hat{n} = aa^{+}$ (Lowering and raising operator) it comes out $n + \frac{3}{2}$? $\endgroup$ – Coolcrab Sep 20 '14 at 20:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.