1
$\begingroup$

A quantum system has Hamiltonian $H$ with normalised eigenstates $\psi_n$ and corresponding energies $E_n$ ($n = 1,2,3...$). A linear operator $Q$ is defined by its action on these states: $$ Q\psi_1 = \psi_2 $$ $$ Q\psi_2 = \psi_1 $$ $$ Q\psi_n = 0, n>2 $$ Show that $Q$ has eigenvalues 1 and -1 and find the corresponding normalised eigenstates $\zeta_1$ and $\zeta_2$, in terms of energy eigenstates. Calculate $\langle H \rangle$ in each of the states $\zeta_1$ and $\zeta_2$.

A measurement of $Q$ is made at time=0, and the result 1 is obtained. The system is then left undisturbed for a time $t$, at which instant another measurement of $Q$ is made. What is the probability that the result will again be 1? Show that the probability is 0 if the measurement is made after a time $T = \pi \hbar/(E_2 - E_1)$, assuming $E_2 - E_1> 0$.

I found $$ \zeta_1 = (\psi_1 + \psi_2)/\sqrt{2} $$ $$ \zeta_2 = (\psi_1 - \psi_2)/\sqrt{2} $$ and $\langle H \rangle = (E_1 + E_2)/2$ for both.

I have trouble doing the second part.

Doesnt the system collapse into $ \zeta_1$ given we know this is the state at time =0? so probability will be 1?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Doesnt the system collapse into ζ1 given we know this is the state at time t=0?

True, but after the measurement at $t_0$ the system follows the unitary dynamics given by $H$. As you can easily check, $\zeta_1$ is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, iff $E_1\neq E_2$. Hence the system will not remain in the state $\zeta_1$ during time-evolution.

If you were to perform another measurement directly after the first one, the outcome would be the same. Here and generally this is not true for arbitrary times between measurements.

As a hint, I remind you that the time-evolution of an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian looks like $$ U(t,t_0)\psi_n = \exp\left[-i(t-t_0)E_n / \hbar \right] \psi_n $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks. so ψ(x,0) = (ψ1 + ψ2)/√2, and U(t,0) = exp(-iHt/ħ), then ψ(x,t) = U(t,0)ψ(x,0) = exp(-iHt/ħ)(ψ1 + ψ2)/√2 taking inner product : ∫ [exp(iHt/ħ)((ψ1)* + (ψ2)*)/√2][(ψ1 + ψ2)/√2] dx = exp(iHt/ħ) is this correct? but i dont know what H is here, is it (E1+E2)/2? $\endgroup$ – Martin Cheung Sep 19 '14 at 8:19
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinCheung Well, you know how $H$ acts on the $\psi_n$... Btw.: there is no variable $x$ in your problem. You're not dealing with position here. You can label your states by a quantum number $n$ as eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. So don't write $\psi(x,t)$ and better not represent the inner product as an integral. $\endgroup$ – Nephente Sep 19 '14 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ so ψ(0) = (ψ1 + ψ2)/√2, ψ(t) = U(t,0)ψ(0) = exp(-iHt/ħ)(ψ1 + ψ2)/√2 = [exp(-iE1t/ħ)ψ1 + exp(-iE2t/ħ)ψ]/√2. then find the probability amplitude of (ψ1 + ψ2)/√2 in this time-varying state by taking the inner product ((ψ1 + ψ2)/√2 , ψ(t)), squared it to find the probability = [1 + cos((E2-E1)t/h)]/2, then sub in T = pi*h/(E2-E1) indeed got probability = 0. but why after T it'll stay 0? doesnt it cycle again by the consine term? $\endgroup$ – Martin Cheung Sep 20 '14 at 2:48
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinCheung Your analysis seems correct and indeed, the probability is periodic. It does not stay zero. As far as i understand, the problem doesn't claim this to be the case. It asks for a very specific time, not all times larger than some time. $\endgroup$ – Nephente Sep 21 '14 at 8:52
  • $\begingroup$ @MartinCheung Did you solve the problem or do you need further clarification? If not, consider upvoting/accepting my answer. $\endgroup$ – Nephente Sep 23 '14 at 8:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.