3
$\begingroup$

Suppose the centre of mass of 2 bodies coincide , then how will we calculate the gravitational force between the 2 bodies ??

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I suppose this physical situation is possible if one of the bodies (the "larger" one) has a cavity in it. $\endgroup$
    – BMS
    Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ Or if the two bodies are some system of distributed masses joined with light rods. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ I think this cannot be calculated with newtonian mechanics. $\endgroup$
    – XZark
    Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 16:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @XZark why would you think that? No matter what the configuration, a few volume integrals will produce the answer (tho' off the top of my head I suspect a certain symmetry will apply & simplify the effort). $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 17:00
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Yes, of course it can, though you may need to use an integral equation. The trouble is that it isn't clear to us what you mean. Two solid bodies can't overlap, so their centres of mass can only coincide if at least one of the bodies has a hole in it where its centre of mass is. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 17:00

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Suppose you have two densities of mass $\rho_1$ and $\rho_2$. The two centers of mass coincide if $$ \vec R_{CM_1} = \frac{\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \vec r \rho_1(\vec r) \, d^3r}{\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\rho_1(\vec r) d^3r} \quad \vec R_{CM_2} = \frac{\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \vec r \rho_2(\vec r) \, d^3r}{\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\rho_2(\vec r) d^3r} $$ are equal, but the force is not calculated as $$ \vec F = -G \frac{M_1M_2}{|\vec R_{CM_1} - \vec R_{CM_2}|^3}\left(\vec R_{CM_1} - \vec R_{CM_2} \right) $$ Instead you must sum the contribution of all the infinitesimal elements $$ \vec F = -G \int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{\rho_1(\vec r_1)\rho_2(\vec r_2)}{|\vec r_1 - \vec r_2|^3}\left(\vec r_1 - \vec r_2 \right) d^3r_1 \, d^3r_2 $$ So you are not dividing by zero like in the first formula, the integral is well defined always. It happens that in a spherical distribution of mass, the integral formula reduce to the first one, but in that case the centers of mass never coincides.

$\endgroup$
0
2
$\begingroup$

You do this the same way that you always do it: you compute the integral of the forces of each element on each other element. When both objects are spheres (or have spherical symmetry) the math gets easier - but in general just knowing the location of the center of mass of an object is not sufficient to determine the force.

As an example - if you have a hole through the earth and you try to compute the force of gravity as you fall into the hole, you find that this force goes to zero as you reach the center - even though you are getting closer to the center of gravity. In fact, the force becomes:

$$F = \frac{GM_{earth}m}{r^2}\frac{r^3}{R^3}$$

For an object on the surface of the earth, $F=mg=\frac{GMm}{R^2}$, so $$F= \frac{m g r}{R}$$

But in general, the way to do this is to compute the (vector) sum of all the forces between any two infinitesimal elements in the two objects. Which is hard when they are not spherical.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ that means if there is no symmetry in general we must know the position of each and every particle of the bodies , then compute the integral of forces of each of them . Am I getting it right?? $\endgroup$
    – XZark
    Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 17:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes that's right. Symmetry is your friend in most of these cases - in particular when you can let things cancel out (you don't have to know their value when they sum to zero) $\endgroup$
    – Floris
    Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 17:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.