2
$\begingroup$
  1. What is supersymmetry?

  2. How is it useful in unifying physics? I have heard that supersymmetry states that every fermion is associated with a boson and vice versa. But I don't get hope this can help resolving problems in unifying physics.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

What is supersymmetry (in a big nutshell)?

To explain supersymmetry, let us consider the simplest supersymmetric model which is the Wess-Zumino model with an action,

$$S=-\int d^4x \left( \frac{1}{2}\partial^\mu \phi^\star \partial_\mu \phi + i\psi^\dagger \bar{\sigma}^\mu \partial_\mu \psi + |F|^2 \right)$$

where $\phi$ is a scalar field, $\psi$ a Majorana spinor field and $F$ is known as an auxiliary field, a pseudo-scalar, which arises due to a subtlety explained later. A supersymmetry is a continuous symmetry relating bosons to fermions and vice versa. Most importantly, for it to be a symmetry of the system, we must require that the Lagrangian changes only up to a total derivative. Naively, we might propose:

$$\delta\phi = \epsilon_\alpha \psi^\alpha$$ $$\delta\psi^\alpha = \epsilon^\alpha\phi$$

where we have introduced an infinitesimal parameter $\epsilon^\alpha$ which is required in order to balance the indices on both sides of the transformation. The parameter is fermionic; to deduce the dimensionality, we can do some dimensional analysis.

$$[\partial_\mu\phi^\star\partial_\mu\phi] = 4,\; [\partial_\mu] = 1$$

hence $[\phi] = 1$. Similar reasoning for the fermionic field shows $[\psi] = 3/2$, as expected. Now from the transformation, we may deduce the dimension of the arbitrary parameter:

$$[\epsilon^\alpha] = [\psi]-[\phi] = 1/2$$

and $[\epsilon_\alpha] = -1/2$. Plugging the transformation in, and deducing $\delta\mathcal{L}$, we will find it does not quite cancel to leave only a total derivative left. After some manipulation, we can find:

$$\delta\psi_\alpha = -i(\sigma^\nu\epsilon^\dagger)_\alpha \partial_\nu \phi$$

Now to address the auxiliary field, $F$. If we compute the equations of motion, we find

$$\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial F} \sim F \quad \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial F)} = 0$$

which implies $F=0$. Although it may seem adding the field has no effect, remember that $F=0$ is only true on-shell. The purpose of $F$ then is actually off-shell, which you will notice balances the required degrees of freedom of the system for consistency.


A Historical Note

In 1967, Coleman and Mandula published a paper, All Possible Symmetry of the S-Matrix, which aptly presented a theorem restricting S-matrix symmetries. However, a key assumption was

A symmetry transformation is said to be an internal symmetry transformation if it commutes with P. This implies that it acts only on particle-type indices, and has no matrix elements between particles of different four-momentum or different spin. A group composed of such transformations is called an internal symmetry group.

In other words, the symmetries were bosonic; notice that supersymmetry is in fact fermionic, and hence not subject to the Coleman-Mandula theorem. In some ways, one may attribute the initial development of supersymmetry to a desire to find a loophole in the Coleman-Mandula theorem.


Resources

  • For a simple introduction, see the Beyond the Standard Model course by Professor Veronica Sanz, available here: http://www.perimeterscholars.org/338.html, which includes videos.
  • For a modern introduction, complete with superfields, supermanifolds and more, see the text String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction, by Becker, Becker and Schwarz where it is presented in the context of string theory.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.