Allan variance, $\sigma^2[ \tau ]$, or its square root (Allan deviation, $\sigma[ \tau ]$) is a quantity (as function of parameter $\tau$) which is said to be a measure of (or related to) "stability of clocks".

For a recent example cmp. "First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2" (T. P. Heavner et al.), especially

"Figure 1. The Total deviation (TOTDEV) of NIST-F2".

Clearly, this quantity is referring to one clock itself; e.g. "the NIST-F2" in the article.

However, the Wikipedia page points out that for "practical measurements":

"All measurements of Allan variance will in effect be the comparison of two different clocks [...] a reference clock and a device under test (DUT)."

Likewise, the article on the NIST-F2 states that

"The measurement was made using a commercial hydrogen maser as a reference."

With two clocks being involved, there's necessarily concern about clock drift; indeed:

"[...] drift will contribute to [the raw] output result. When measuring a real system, the linear drift or other drift mechanism may need to be estimated and removed from the time-series prior to calculating the Allan variance."

My question:

Can you please give an expression (as explicitly as reasonably achievable here)
of this mentioned "(raw) output result before post-processing",
in terms of

  • the total phase $\Phi_a[ t ]$ of the "device under test",

  • the total phase $\Phi_b[ t ]$ of the "reference",

  • and other parameters as needed, such as perhaps the nominal angular frequencies, $\omega_a$ and $\omega_b$, of the device under test and of the reference, respectively ?



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.