0
$\begingroup$

I don't believe the following is an accurate description of the physical but a homework problem to help understanding.

A beam of electron of energy 0.025 eV moving along x-direction, passes through a slit of variable width w placed along y-axis. Estimate the value of the width of the slit for which the spot size on a screen kept at a distance of 0.5 m from slit would be minimum.

I have the following idea:

$$\theta \sim \frac{\lambda}{d}$$, where $\lambda$ is the wavelength, d is slit width, and $\theta$ represents diffraction spot size as an angle measure. For any $L$, the distance to the screen, this quantity goes minimum for $d$ tending to $\infty$

I have an intuition that the uncertainty principle shall be used to get a upper bound on $d$ as effects of Heisenberg's uncertainty exceed effects of diffraction.

That way, I would have $$v_y = \Delta v_y = \frac{\hbar}{m_e \Delta y} = \frac{\hbar}{m_e d}$$

Taking $$v_x = \sqrt{\frac{2 K}{m_e}}$$, we have the spot size in angles as

$$\frac{v_y}{v_x} = \frac{\hbar}{d \sqrt{2 K m_e}} = \frac{\lambda}{d}$$

That leaves me nowhere only when it starts seeming I have solved it.

Please help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is a tautology. It is the Heisenberg uncertainty which introduces a wave nature to the probability of interaction of a particle with the slits geometry. $\endgroup$ – anna v Dec 24 '16 at 5:15
1
$\begingroup$

If the slit width is large compared to the electron wavelength then the spot size will be the same as the slit width (assuming the electron beam doesn't diverge):

$$ \text{spot size} = w $$

In the limit of small slit width you get the equation you cite for the (half) angular divergence, and the spot width will be (assuming $\sin\theta \approx \theta$):

$$ \text{spot size} = 2L\frac{\lambda}{w} $$

where $L$ is the distance to the screen (0.5m). The smallest spot will be when these coincide i.e.

$$ w = 2L\frac{\lambda}{w} $$

or:

$$ w = \sqrt{2L\lambda} $$

which I get to be about 88 microns. NB this is a very rough calculation as the spot doesn't have a clearly defined width and even with large slits there will be diffraction at the slit edges.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @Phonon I don't understand ... that post has nothing to do with this topic. $\endgroup$ – garyp Aug 11 '16 at 11:18
  • $\begingroup$ @garyp Indeed, my bad, it is removed now. $\endgroup$ – Phonon Aug 11 '16 at 15:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.