0
$\begingroup$

On the outer edges of Newton Ring patterns, the fringes are really close together, and much more uneven. Also, the spacing does not seem to decrease linearly at all as you move from the center. Why is this (if there is maths involed, a diagram would be very helpful for me).

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I wonder how you discovered this... do you have a picture? $\endgroup$ – QuantumDot Aug 8 '14 at 19:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ At the very least, provide the test setup in question, with quantitive values for source collimation (or cone angle), as well as the measurement techniques you used. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Aug 8 '14 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_rings for diagrams and maths... $\endgroup$ – DJohnM Aug 8 '14 at 21:39
  • $\begingroup$ I dont know how to add pictures, and I saw in my physics book, but I thought it was weird, because I thought they would be equally spaced out if the radius of curvature was constant. But now I see otherwise. Also, @carl, I am not very experienced, so I am not even close to that level with these. I am just a sophmore in highschool. I tried looking at the wikipedia article and everything, but it didn't help. Instead of doing bad research, since I don't know that much, I thought I would ask on here so that I could get good information. $\endgroup$ – Minka Aug 9 '14 at 4:48
3
$\begingroup$

I am answering your question here, but please provide more information about your goals/experience, as specified by the comments. Primarily, I would like to say that I was planning on answering your question much less in depth than I ended up doing. However, while brushing up, I got carried away and figured out some very interesting calculations concerning your question:

In order to aptly portray the reason for this phenomenon, I will begin by addressing why the rings form. In addition, I would like to note that I will be using a convex glass lens as an example for the sake of simplicity (and by your assertions, I am assuming that is what you are familiar with). However, most experimental research done with this phenomenon requires far more complex calculations, with changing radii of curvature [these calculations are sometimes conducted to test the flatness of a glass surface beyond what can be done with a sphereometer]. The illuminated rings become visible when the change in path between the two interfering waves is :

$\bigg\{\cfrac{\lambda}{2}, \cfrac{3\lambda} {2}, \cfrac{5\lambda}{2},...\bigg\}$

Thus, the path difference between any pair of adjacent rings is $\pm \lambda$ (depending on whether the adjacent ring is on the inside or outside relative to its partner).

The rings themselves are formed via thin film interference, by a minuscule layer of air between a curved glass surface and the flat glass surface where it resides. Due to the curvature of the glass surface, the thickness of the air layer does not increase linearly. The farther a point is from the center, the smaller the horizontal distance, which means an increase in vertical thickness of $\lambda$. Thus, the horizontal distance between two neighboring rings decreases as we observe radially outward from the center.

Here is a visual:

enter image description here

$\textbf{Mathematical approximation for high order ring separation:}$

This part I believe you will find exceptionally useful, since your objective concerned small separation the higher order fringes . Mathematically speaking, if you want to address the change in distance between adjacent rings, it is possible to make an approximation. If we assume that the order number, $\mu>>1$ and that $\triangle\mu = 1$, we are allowed to safely assume that the distance between a pair of rings ($\triangle r)$ is equal to:

$\cfrac{(dr)(\triangle \mu)}{d\mu}$ (I am assuming here that you have taken introductory physics, which is typically taken with first semester calculus as a co-requisite, so this should make sense to you). Due to the fact that we have a standard formula for the radius of a ring of order $\mu$, [which I will not derive, but it is explained in a wikipedia link given to you above in the comments], we can make the following calculations:

$\Omega = $ radius of curvature

$\mu =$ order

$r =$ radius of ring

$\triangle\ r =$ separation of rings

$\lambda =$ wavelength

$r = \big((\mu - \frac12 )\lambda \Omega\big)^{1/2}$ and from above we know that $\triangle r =$$\cfrac{(dr)(\triangle \mu)}{d\mu}$ and since $\triangle\mu$ = $1$, $\triangle r$ = $\cfrac{\Omega\lambda}{2}\big((\mu - \frac12 )\lambda \Omega\big)^{-1/2}$, or if we square our value and then take the square root, we can achieve a much simpler value of:

$\triangle r = \sqrt{\bigg(\cfrac{\lambda \Omega}{4(\mu - \frac12)}\bigg)}$

Here, I have graphed this function. Notice that the fringe distance between a pair of rings has a horizontal asymptote approaching zero as the order number approaches infinity :

enter image description here

It worth mentioning here that you can do the same calculation for the dark rings, but you would use $\mu$, instead of $\mu - \cfrac12$. Let me know if you have any questions.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you,I get the first part, but I haven't taken calculus, so the math was hard to understand. But I understand the graph and the final function as they relate to my question. This probably took a while I apprciate it. $\endgroup$ – Minka Aug 9 '14 at 4:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.