3
$\begingroup$

In A.Zee's "QFT in a nutshell"book Page 324, after he wrote down the general Lagrangian, he said "in previous chapter, we learned that by introducing a Chern-Simons gauge field we can transform $\psi$ to a scalar field" However, I didn't found any clarification about this argument in previous chapter. Any comment or references are greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Please add more details to your question, not everyone has a Zee lying around: The general Lagrangian of what? $\psi$ is any fermion field? A Chern-Simons gauge field is the Chern 3-form here? How does Zee couple the Chern-Simons field to the fermion? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Aug 6 '14 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ The Lagrangian is just the usual form of describing electron in a magnetic field, since Zee want to argue Quantum Hall effect in that page. However, my question seems like a general argument which is independent of specific Lagrangian setup. The Chern-Simons term is just AdA, no AAA gauge self-interaction term .About the coupling thing, in previous chapter Zee argued the Chern-Simons term can be generated from gauged kinetic term by loop effects. I strongly recommend whoever interested reading Zee's book for explicit detail. $\endgroup$ – Curio Aug 7 '14 at 4:06
1
$\begingroup$

Yes, this is explained in the previous chapter (Fractional Quantum Hall effect)

Surprisingly, when we have a filling factor $\nu$ of the Landau levels of form $\frac{1}{3}$ or $\frac{1}{5}$, the quantum Hall fluid appears incompressible. This seems curious, because the integer quantum Hall effect appears only for integer values, corresponding to $\nu$ Landau levels completely filled (they have the degeneracy $\frac{BA}{2\pi}$, where $B$ is the magnetic field, and $A$ is the area occupied by the electrons).

So, something happens, calling $N_e$ the number of electrons ,when $\dfrac{N_e}{(\frac{BA}{2\pi})}= \nu$, with $\nu^{-1}$ odd.

Now, you have to notice that $\frac{BA}{2\pi}$ is simply the number of flux quanta $N_\phi$

So, finally, the number of flux quanta by electron, is : $\dfrac{N_\phi}{N_e} = \nu^{-1}$, a odd integer.

Now, if we look at the statistics, exchanging $2$ particles, we have the $(-1)$ term coming from the Fermi statistics, now multiplyed by an other $(-1)^{\nu^{-1}}$ term coming from a Aharanov-Bohm effect.

So, finally, one have a $(+1)$ term, which signals a Bose statistics.

A Dirac spinor in $(2+1)$ dimensions having $2$ degrees of freedom, we simply have to choose a bosonic field with $2$ degrees of freedom, that is a complex scalar field.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Oh I see, that argument just sit above the Lagrangian..I should have read more carefully. Thank you very much for pointing that out. $\endgroup$ – Curio Aug 7 '14 at 20:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.