Why is there no gravitational magnetic field? (Or, is there?) We can think that the electric field and the gravitational field operate similarly in the sense that the forms of their governing laws (namely, Coulomb's law and Newton's law respectively) are strikingly similar. The only difference one can point out is that while the electric charges come in two flavors, the gravitational masses come in just one.
Now, I have read that when a charged particle moves, the electric field lines associated with are distorted in a fashion because of the finite time required for the information about the change in the position of the charge to get propagated. And, I have led to the understanding that this is the cause of the existence of the magnetic field (and that if calculus is used it can be proven mathematically). 
So (if this is true then) why doesn't the same thing happen to the gravitational field? Why is there nothing like a gravitational magnetic field? Or, is there?
Note
I have changed the language and the tone of the question massively. Although the question was fairly well received, I believe it was really ill-posed. As pointed out by ACuriousMind in the comment, the ''reason''described here behind the existence of the magnetic field is something that cannot be found a good support for. But still, due to the similarity between the equations describing their static behavior of electric and gravitational fields, one can still ask as to whether a boost would create some sort of a gravitational magnetic field if the original frame only had a static gravitational field. As the accepted answer points out, the answer is, roughly, a yes but the Maxwell-type equations for gravity aren't as well-behaved as are the original Maxwell equations of electromagnetism--one should note. In particular, the equations for gravity take the Maxwell-like form in appropriate weak limits only in some appropriately chosen gauges--and aren't Lorentz covariant. 
 A: There is a gravitational analogue of the magnetic field. See gravitoelectromagnetism and frame dragging on Wikipedia.
A: There is a sort of analog called gravitomagnetism (or gravitoelectromagnetism), but it is not discussed that often because it applies only in a special case. It is an approximation of general relativity (i.e. the Einstein Field Equations) in the case where:


*

*The weak field limit applies.

*The correct reference frame is chosen (it's not entirely clear to me exactly what conditions the reference frame must fulfill).


In this special case, the equations of GR reduce to:
$$
\begin{align}
\nabla\cdot \vec{E}_g &~=~ -4\pi G \rho_g \\[5px]
\nabla\cdot \vec{B}_g &~=~ 0 \\[5px]
\nabla\times \vec{E}_g &~=~ -\frac{\partial \vec{B}_g}{\partial t} \\[5px]
\nabla\times \vec{B}_g &~=~ 4\left(-\frac{4\pi G}{c^2}\vec{J}_g+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \vec{E}_g}{\partial t}\right)
\end{align}
$$
These are of course a close analogy to Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism.
A: The reason that magnetogravitational fields don't appear in purely Newtonian gravitation is that magnetism is actually a relativistic effect.  If you use the CGS system of units, you'll see that only the quantity $B/c$ appears in the Lorentz force law.  The nonrelativstic (Newtonian) limit is equivalent to the limit $c \to \infty$, so in this limit the magnetic fields drop out entirely.
