# Erosion effect from Coriolis force in a South-to-North water channel?

Imagine we could build a channel (like those cool ones in some countries) but very, very long, parallel to a meridian (ie South-North direction).. The channel would contain water, which would permanently flow from the beginning of the channel in the southern tip of South America towards the end of the channel in Alaska. Let's imagine the walls and bead of the channel are made from stone and the water is always running. Let's say there is a constant force which makes the water flow (and let's disregard the source and sink of the water in the channel). Flow is constant, that's what matters for now.

I wonder if the walls of the channel will eventually wear out (thousands, maybe millions of years) differently? Eg. given that the water flows from South to North, would the West wall wear out in the Southern Hemisphere while the East wall wears out in the Northern Hemisphere?

How important is flow speed for this answer?

• I agree with your instinct that those sides would experience wear, and of course the flow rate would matter. I would expect the effect to be least at the equator, and greatest near the poles. Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 2:41

If you project the velocity of a water parcel traveling up the channel into radial coordinates in both the inertial frame (space frame) and the rotating frame of reference (earth frame) then I think the necessary effects will become apparent.

In the earth's frame, the velocity is (use a ' to symbolize the rotating frame):

$$\vec{v} = 0\cdot\hat{r}' + v_{flow}\cdot\hat{\theta}' + 0\cdot\hat{\phi}'$$

In the space frame, the velocity is:

$$\vec{v} = 0\cdot\hat{r} + v_{flow}\cdot\hat{\theta} + v_{\theta \:max}\cdot\cos\theta\cdot\hat{\phi}$$

For both frames: If the water flows at a constant rate in the theta direction, then the theta component of the velocity vector is constant. Also, the r component will be zero for both cases since we assume the earth radius to be constant.

For the earth frame: If the water is flowing directly from south to north, then the phi component is zero in the earth's rotating frame.

For the rotating frame: The water flowing from south to north means it must be picking up speed in the $\hat{\phi}$ direction. This is kept track of by the $v_{\theta \:max}\cdot\cos\theta\cdot\hat{\phi}$ in the space frame velocity equation.

In the nonrotating frame, the change in velocity in the $\hat{\phi}$ direction means there must be an acceleration to produce it. This means the water must get an acceleration from the west wall toward the phi direction while in the southern hemisphere in order to increase the velocity enough to keep up with the earth. This will happen until you cross the equator which at that point the water has to start to slow down to keep tracking in the channel on the earth. This means there must be an acceleration, but this time from the east wall of the channel.

Long story short, the west wall will erode in the southern hemisphere and the east wall will erode in the northern hemisphere. You can do more math by taking derivatives to get the acceleration as a function of angle and then find the spots of greatest erosion, etc.