1
$\begingroup$

A low energy expansion of a system I am currently investigating is described by this XY-like model:

$$ H_1 = \int_0^\beta \mathrm{d} \tau \int_{\left[ 0, L \right]^2} \mathrm{d}^2 x \left( J \left( \nabla \theta \right)^2 + K \left( \partial_\tau \theta \right)^2 \right) $$

It is essentially an anisotropic XY model. It is better analyzed, as far as my question is concerned, by considering $\tau$ a space dimension, so the model is effectively 3D. If we take $\beta=L$ and $J=K$ to make it isotropic, then it undergoes a phase transition for $T=2.20$; a mean field model is presented by Kleinert ("Gauge fields in Condensed Matter", World Scientific, 1989), there the critical temperature is estimated to be $3$.

I have some Montecarlo results for a similar lattice model:

$$ H_2 = - \sum_{\langle ij \rangle} J_{ij} \cos \left( \theta_i - \theta_j \right) $$

in which $J_{ij}$ can take different values if the link is on the $x-y$ plane or along the $z$ direction, I'll call them $J_{xy}$ and $J_z$; these features should account for the anisotropy of the first system, because I'd like to map it $H_2$ to $H_1$. The system described by $H_2$ lives on a cube lattice.

How do I map the first Hamiltonian into the second one? By knowing for which values of $J_{xy}$ and $J_z$ the system $H_2$ is at the critical point, I would like to know the critical values of $J$ and $K$.

I observed that a naive mapping $J_{xy} \to J$, $J_z \to K$ doesn't work, because I can always rescale $\tau$ and $(x,y)$ in the first Hamiltonian. This is mathematically equivalent, but leads to a different mapping, so it shows that this naive mapping doesn't work. I think that the reason is that by rescaling the length I am also modifying the limits of integrations, and this cannot be ignored by just "naively" imposing periodic boundary conditions: the system is anisotropic as far as the coupling is concerned, but also as far as the box it's contained is concerned.

My guess: maybe I should rescale the lengths in the first Hamiltonian so that the system lives on a cube, i.e. $\beta \to \beta' = L$ and then maybe I am allowed to map the first Hamiltonian to the first one. Also in this case the $L \to \infty$ limit seems particularly badly behaved, I can provide more details if needed.

However I am not sure the this is the way to go, and I would like some advice about this issue. Thank you in advance!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Note that $J_{xy}$ and $J_z$ have the dimensions of energy while $J$ and $K$ have dimension of energy/(area x time). In the process of making the continuum Hamiltonian into a discrete one, you will need to choose short distance scales for both space as well as (Euclidean) time. You can choose a square lattice of length say, $a$ for space and split the time in scales of length $b$. Then, one dimensional grounds, you should expect to see the following map: $$ \frac{J_{xy}}{a^2b} \rightarrow J\quad,\quad \frac{J_z}{a^2b} \rightarrow K\ . $$ These are related to the naive scaling (of space and time) dimensions of $J$ and $K$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.