0
$\begingroup$

Let $F(x^\mu)$ is a scalar function; i.e. $F(x^\mu): \mathbb{R}^{1,3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. How the Poincare Group $P(1,3)$ will act on it; i.e., by which formula I can calculate it for a specific function $F(x^\mu)$?

Edit 1: We know that a subgroup of Poincare group $P(1,3)$ leaves the hypersurface $\Sigma: x^+ = 0$ invariant where $x^+ \equiv x^0 + x^3$. To show this a formula is needed.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You mean "scalar" like $F : \mathbb{R}^{1,3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ not "scalar" like "is invariant under transformations", right? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jul 16 '14 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ yes, $F: \mathbb{R}^{1,3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. $\endgroup$ – rainman Jul 16 '14 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ Well, your edit has not so much to do with the original question, but I'll bite: The subgroup consisting of the identity always leaves everything invariant, so there's nothing to show here. Are you asking how to find the maximal subgroup that leaves $ x^+ = 0$ invariant? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jul 16 '14 at 19:39
  • $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind: yes, how can I find the maximal subgroup? $\endgroup$ – rainman Jul 20 '14 at 20:34
1
$\begingroup$

If you do not know anything more about $F$, the only way to do this is to simply plug the transform result $\Lambda^\mu_\nu x^\nu$ into $F$ and see what happens. General functions into $\mathbb{R}$ cannot be expected to behave nicely in any way.

However, I cannot really fathom a situation where you would have to use a function in $\mathbb{R}$ where you would not know (or demand) that it is truly scalar, i.e. transform trivially under whatever group you have. A bit more detail from you could perhaps help here.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ edited the question to clarify it. $\endgroup$ – rainman Jul 16 '14 at 19:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.