5
$\begingroup$

Often, when threating some problem of fluid dynamics I have read that people make the approximation of irrotational fluid, i.e. the velocity field is assumed irrotational: $$ \nabla \times \vec{v}=0 $$ I have read on the web that this hypotesis is consistent if the viscosity of the fluid is very small and if the fluid motion is adiabatic. However I have not understand why small viscosity and adiabatic motion allows us to consider the fluid irrotational.

Could anyone explain me why those assumptions leads to consider the fluid irrotational (or give any good reference)?

$\endgroup$
2
2
$\begingroup$

I believe this has to do with the production of vorticity. If you look at the vorticity transport equation (incompressible, barotropic):

$$ \frac{D\vec{\omega}}{Dt} = (\vec{\omega}\cdot\nabla)\vec{v} +\nu\nabla^2\vec{\omega} $$

you see that if $\vec{\omega} = 0$, then $\frac{D\vec{\omega}}{Dt} = 0$, i.e. there is no production term for vorticity in an incompressible, barotropic flow. Vorticity only enters such a flow at the boundaries, where a vortex sheet is created to satisfy the no-slip condition. If we neglect viscosity and allow for slip at the walls, then vorticity will not be generated and the flow will remain irrotational.

For compressible flows, you can take the curl of the momentum equation, apply Gibbs equation to replace the pressure gradient term, and some algebra to get the following form of the Crocco-Vazsonyi equation [Thompson 1988]:

$$ \frac{D\vec{\omega}}{Dt} = (\vec{\omega}\cdot\nabla)\vec{v} - \vec{\omega}(\nabla \cdot\vec{v}) + \nabla T \times \nabla s + \mu[\text{Lots of other terms}] $$

The last term is negligible if the viscosity $\mu$ is small. So the only vorticity production term is $\nabla T \times \nabla s$. Since the flow is adiabatic, and viscous dissipation is negligible, we have no entropy production, $\Delta s = 0$. Therefore, if this flow started with $\nabla s = 0$, it will remain so. This means $\nabla T \times \nabla s$ will stay $0$, and an initially irrotational flow will remain irrotational.

References:

  • Thompson, Philip A. Compressible-fluid Dynamics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.