For our Classical Mechanics class, I'm reading Chapter 1 of Goldstein, et al. Now I come across Eq. (1.50). To put it in context:

$$\begin{align*} \sum_i{\dot{\mathbf{p}_i} \cdot \delta\mathbf{r}_i}&=\sum_i{m_i\ddot{\mathbf{r}}_i \cdot \delta{\mathbf{r}_i}}\\ &=\sum_{i,j}{m_i\ddot{\mathbf{r}}_i} \cdot \frac{\partial\mathbf{r}_i}{\partial q_j} \delta q_j \end{align*}$$

Consider now the relation Eq. (1.50): $$\begin{align*} \sum_{i,j}{m_i\ddot{\mathbf{r}}_i} \cdot \frac{\partial\mathbf{r}_i}{\partial q_j}&= \sum_i{\left[ \frac{d}{dt} \left( m_i\dot{\mathbf{r}}_i \cdot \frac{\partial\mathbf{r}_i}{\partial q_j} \right) - m_i\dot{\mathbf{r}}_i \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}_i}{\partial q_j} \right) \right]} \end{align*}$$

I'm at a loss for how he resolved it that way. He goes on to explain that we can interchange the differentiation with respect to $t$ and $q_j$. My question is: Why is there a subtraction in Eq. (1.50)?


Why is there a subtraction in Eq. (1.50)?

Goldstein is using the Leibniz rule for differentiation of a product

$$ \frac{d (fg)}{dt}~=~\frac{d f}{dt}g + f\frac{d g}{dt} $$


$$f=m_i\dot{\mathbf{r}}_i $$


$$g=\frac{\partial \mathbf{r}_i}{\partial q_j}. $$

The minus is caused by moving a term to the other side of the equation.

  • $\begingroup$ I see. So the left-hand term in my question is actually $g\frac{df}{dt}$, first term on the right-hand is $\frac{d\left(fg\right)}{dt}$, right? $\endgroup$ – Kit Jul 17 '11 at 11:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Kit: Yes, you are right. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jul 17 '11 at 11:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.