2
$\begingroup$

Due to the Wiki article, "...In quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum...".

Let's have the expression for the propagator of some field $\hat {\Psi}_{l}$ in the free theory: $$ \tag 1 D_{lm}(x - y) = \langle |\hat{T}\left( \hat {\varphi}_{l}(x)\hat {\varphi}_{m}^{\dagger}(y)\right) |\rangle = -\frac{i}{(2 \pi )^{4}}\int \frac{F_{lm}(p)e^{-ip(x - y)}d^{4}p}{p^{2} - m^{2} - i\varepsilon}. $$ Let's use two examples: spinor and scalar fields: for them $(1)$ takes the form $$ \tag 2 D_{lm}(x - y) = D(x - y) = -\frac{i}{(2 \pi )^{4}}\int \frac{e^{-ip(x - y)}d^{4}p}{p^{2} - m^{2} - i\varepsilon}, $$ $$ \tag 3 D_{lm}(x - y) = -\frac{i}{(2 \pi )^{4}}\int \frac{(\gamma^{\mu}p_{\mu} + m)_{lm}e^{-ip(x - y)}d^{4}p}{p^{2} - m^{2} - i\varepsilon} $$ respectively.

How to convert $(2), (3)$ into the probability (which lies at interval $[0, 1]$)? Particularly i don't understand what to do with spinor indices in $(3)$ (the probability must be Lorentz scalar, so I need to sum over the indices (?)). And also, why doesn't probability depends on momentum (the propagator doesn't contain info about momentum)?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See Feynman diagrams. You must take in account vertex factors, and incoming/outgoing particles. Propagator (in momentum space) does contain information about momentum. $\endgroup$
    – Trimok
    Jul 7, 2014 at 8:24

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The propagator is a different object than the probability, even though they are essentially the same in time-independent quantum mechanics. In quantum field theory, $D(x-y) = \langle \psi(y)\psi^{*}(x)\rangle$ which is not a conserved quantity; in fact, it is badly divergent on the light-cone even for non-relativistic fields. On the other hand, for fermions and scalars, we take the conserved charge current $j_{\mu} = \frac{\hbar}{2 i m}(\psi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi - \psi \partial_{\mu}\psi^*)$ and take its zeroth component $j_0$ which is conserved separately assuming you are integrating over all of space and your fields are decaying fast enough at infinity since its rate of change is a total divergence. This is proportional to the probability assuming you are interested in equal-time probability (if you are in a boosted frame, you might be interested in a different part of $j_{\mu}$ that is normal to your hyperplane). Probability is not a Lorentz invariant quantity, so you are going to see the energy $E$ without its $\vec p$ counterpart. In fact, the probability in momentum space is related to the propagator as $$P(p) \propto j_0(p) = \frac{E}{m}D(p)$$ Since the only dimensional number that can make this dimensionless is its mass, we have $$P(p) = \frac{E m}{p^2 - m^2 - i\epsilon}$$ up to a constant c-number.

To answer your question about spinor indices, you trace over them, which is why there is no $\not \!p$ and the answer is the same for scalars and fermions.

Aside: For general hypersurfaces $\Sigma$ that have a normal direction at each point $n^{\mu}$ (for example an equal-time surface such that $n^{\mu} = (1,0,0,0)$), $j_{\mu}n^{\mu}$ is your probability (assuming the surface is flat - see this for details). Also, for a fun quantum mechanics-only motivation of this current see here.

Note that this current only works for massive, uncharged fields. For charged fields, see this. For a probability current for the photon, only in the last 4 years has there been one proposed.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.