The equation in the title of this question can be a relativistic analogue of the Navier-Stokes equation (in the sense that, in the low-velocity limit, it reduces to Euler's equation when $T^{ab}$ is the stress-energy tensor of a perfect fluid).

I imagine that this equation is difficult to analyze in general relativity where the covariant derivative depends on the stress-energy tensor itself.

But in special relativity, are solutions known to exist and be unique?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Solutions with what boundary conditions? $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Commented Jan 19, 2018 at 14:47
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Solutions to what? $\nabla^aT_{ab}$ is an expression, not an equation. Do you perhaps mean $\nabla^aT_{ab}=0$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2018 at 21:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Existence and uniqueness of Navier-Stokes is an unsolved problem even in flat space and in the non-relativistic limit. Full GR is not going to male the situation any simpler. $\endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Commented Jan 25, 2018 at 2:07

1 Answer 1


First, I think you mean the equation $\nabla^a T_{ab} = 0$. This is not the generalised Navier-Stokes equation, it is just a version of the $T_{ab}$ on-shell conservation equation in curved spacetime. For instance, if you write $T_{ab}$ for a point-particle you obtain the geodesic equation ($u^b\nabla_b u^a = 0$), while if you write $T_{ab}$ for electromagnetic fields, you get Maxwell's equations ($\nabla^a F_{ab} = 0$). It is true that if you write $T_{ab}$ for a general fluid you obtain a GR version of Navier Stokes equations.

The full set of classical equations you need to solve in GR is $G_{ab} = 8\pi G\,T_{ab}$ (if you take covariant derivatives you get $\nabla^a T_{ab} = 0$). These are a hardcore version of Navier-Stokes in the sense that there are $10$ extremely non-linear equations with some redundancy (choice of coordinates), plus the equations of motions for the matter/radiation, which involve the metric. There is not known general solution, and the usual procedure is to use the symmetries of the problem to guess the form of $g_{ab}$ and $T_{ab}$ and then introduce them to the equations.

In special relativity you can take an inertial frame so that the equation is $\partial^aT_{ab} = 0$, which is just the on-shell conservation of energy and momentum. For electromagnetic fields these are just Maxwell's equations, and a general solution to these is known because they are linear. For a point-particle the solution is the geodesic equation, which has the solution of the particle traveling at constant 4-velocity $u^a$. For the fluid, you just have a relativistic version of Navier-Stokes, which is non-linear and no general solutions are known.

Existence of solutions for every initial conditions is not guaranteed I believe, but if they are smooth enough (and for a physicist they always are) you expect the solution to exist. Uniqueness of solutions is guaranteed in GR if the initial data is specified on a Cauchy surface, though I believe that this is proven for matter/radiation $T_{ab}$ that satisfies some conditions, plus the initial data to be smooth enough.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.