2
$\begingroup$

I want to calculate the matrix elements of the operator $\hat{x} \hat{p}$ in momentum and position basis, that is the two quantities ($p,q$ - momenta, $x,y$ - positions):

$$\langle p|\hat{x} \hat{p}|q\rangle$$ $$\langle x|\hat{x} \hat{p}|y\rangle$$

I don't know how to do this. I write $\hat{p}|q\rangle = q | q \rangle$. And $\hat{x} |q \rangle = -i\hbar \frac{d}{dp} | q\rangle$, so

$$\langle p|\hat{x} \hat{p}|q\rangle = -i\hbar q \frac{d}{dp} \delta(p-q)$$

This is nonsensical.

How do I proceed?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Very similar question in the position basis: physics.stackexchange.com/q/53252 $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jun 24 '14 at 16:19
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, could it be that my answer is not that far off from the truth? After all, the derivative of the $\delta(x)$ is $-\frac{\delta(x)}{x}$, and intuition tells me there is similarity between the two problems (momentum in position basis and position in momentum basis)... Nevertheless, I would appreciate if someone could write out the detalied answer. $\endgroup$ – Spine Feast Jun 24 '14 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ The thing that bugs me the most is this: $\hat{x} |q \rangle = -i\hbar \frac{d}{dp} | q\rangle$ - is this even true?? I know that the position operator in momentum basis is $-i\hbar \frac{d}{dp}$, but did I convert this to Dirac notation correctly? $\endgroup$ – Spine Feast Jun 24 '14 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ If by $|q\rangle$, you mean a momentum-space ket, then it should be true (see this post for more information on that). $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jun 24 '14 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, p and q are the momentum space kets, like x and y are the position space kets. $\endgroup$ – Spine Feast Jun 24 '14 at 16:58
3
$\begingroup$

It's not non-sensical at all, except that there shouldn't be a minus sign (as mentioned in the comments) and that you took an operator outside of an expectation value, which I think worked out OK in this case but in general should be avoided. More conservatively,

$$ \hat x = i \hbar \frac{d}{d \hat p} $$

it follows that

$$ \langle q \mid \hat x \hat p \mid q' \rangle = q' \langle q \mid \hat x \mid q' \rangle = i \hbar q' \langle q \mid \frac{d}{d \hat p} \mid q' \rangle = i \hbar q' \langle q \mid \frac{d}{d q'} \mid q' \rangle $$

Remember, an actual physical state is never an idealized momentum (or position) eigenket. A slightly more realistic description of a physical state is a wave packet with a narrow width around some momentum:

$$ \mid p, \sigma \rangle = \int \frac{dq}{2 \pi \hbar} \, \left( \frac{2 \pi \hbar^2}{\sigma^2}\right)^{1/4} e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \mid q \rangle $$

You can check that this is normalized to unity, because

$$ \langle p, \sigma \mid p, \sigma \rangle = 1 $$

Remember that $\langle p \mid q \rangle = 2 \pi \hbar \delta(p-q)$. Now, the expectation value of $\hat x \hat p$ for this physical state is

$$ \langle p, \sigma \mid \hat x \hat p \mid p, \sigma \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \, \sigma } \int dq \, dq' \, e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q'-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \frac{\langle q \mid \hat x \hat p \mid q' \rangle}{2 \pi \hbar} $$

Using the above result, we can integrate the $q'$ integral by parts, yielding

$$ \frac{-i\hbar}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \, \sigma } \int dq \, dq' \, e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \frac{d}{dq'} \left( q' e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q'-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \right) \frac{\langle q \mid q' \rangle}{2 \pi \hbar} $$

Since $\langle q \mid q' \rangle = 2 \pi \hbar \delta(q-q')$, we can integrate out q (and then relabel q' back to q), making this a single integral

$$ \frac{-i\hbar}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \, \sigma} \int dq \, e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \frac{d}{dq} \left( q e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \right) $$

We can integrate by parts again, ending up with

$$ \frac{i\hbar}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \, \sigma} \int dq \, q e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \frac{d}{dq} \left( e^{- \frac{1}{4} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} \right) $$

which is a bit easier to evaluate since we don't have to use the product rule. The derivative brings down a factor $-(q-p)/2\sigma^2$, and the two exponentials combine, leaving us with

$$ \frac{-i\hbar}{ 2\sqrt{2 \pi} \, \sigma^3} \int dq \, q(q-p) e^{- \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{q-p}{\sigma} \right)^2} $$

The first $q$ in the integrand can be rewritten as $(q-p) + p$. Then there are two terms, the latter of which has an odd integrand (of the form $(q-p) \exp(\alpha (q-p)^2)$ and vanishes. So, changing the integrand to $x = (q-p)/\sigma$, we are left with

$$ \frac{-i\hbar}{ 2\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int dx \, x^2 e^{- \frac{1}{2} x^2} $$

The remaining integral is a textbook Gaussian integral, equal to

$$ \int dx \, x^2 e^{-\frac{1}{2} x^2} = \sqrt{2\pi} $$

So, the expectation value of the operator $\hat x \hat p$ for the wave packet is simply

$$ \frac{-i\hbar}{2} $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.