8
$\begingroup$

What is the concept of cosmic strings? Is it related to the strings in the string theory, and if it is, then how?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

In a paper by R. Gregory, Effective Action and Motion of a Cosmic String, the concept is explained well:


In high energy physics, a defect will generically occur during a symmetry breaking process where different parts of a medium choose different vacuum energy configurations, and the non-compatibility of these different vacua forces a sheet, line or point of energy where these non-compatible vacua meet... A defect may be topological, in that it is the topology of the vacuum that simultaneously allows formation, and prevents dissipation...


The fourth order effective action of the string is given by,

$$S=-\mu\int d^2\sigma \sqrt{-\gamma} \left[ 1-r_s^2 \frac{\alpha_1}{\mu}\mathcal{R}+r^4_s \left( \frac{\alpha_2}{\mu}\mathcal{R}^2 + \frac{\alpha_3}{\mu}K_{i\mu\nu}\mathcal{K}^{\mu\nu}_j \mathcal{K}_{i\lambda \rho} \mathcal{K}^{\lambda\rho}_j \right)\right]$$

where $\alpha_i$ are numerical coefficients, $\mu$ the tension of the string, and all geometric quantities evaluated with respect to the worldsheet of the string, which is the manifold traced out by the motion of the string. The worldsheet itself is within the target space or 'spacetime.' The $\mathcal{K}$ terms are the extrinsic curvature of the worldsheet. As R. Gregory states, a priori, it is difficult to determine whether these affect the rigidity of the string.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I thought the idea that cosmic strings could be such topological defects are ruled out by now (dont remember the argument exactly, would have to dig it up), and that cosmic strings (if they are there) would therefore rather be thought of as some fundamental strings of string-theory blown up to huge dimensions during the process of inflation these days. $\endgroup$ – Dilaton Jun 19 '14 at 11:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Dilaton: I don't think it's been ruled out definetively, but you are correct, there is indeed another interpretation as blown up strings of string theory. $\endgroup$ – JamalS Jun 19 '14 at 11:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.