3
$\begingroup$

Given the definition of unix timestamp as the number of seconds elapsed since January 1st, 1970 as GMT+0, without leap seconds, is it possible to create a universal clock that will generate the correct timestamp?

Is the current definition of a second

the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.[1] In 1997 CIPM added that the periods would be defined for a caesium atom at rest, and approaching the theoretical temperature of absolute zero (0 K), and in 1999, it included corrections from ambient radiation.[1] Absolute zero implies no movement, and therefore zero external radiation effects (i.e., zero local electric and magnetic fields).

sufficient for this?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The question in the second paragraph is interesting, but has nothing to do with the unix timestamp. So talking about that is very distracting from your question; Also the title should be more to the point of the question - could you edit trying to change both? $\endgroup$ – Volker Siegel Jun 17 '14 at 19:36
7
$\begingroup$

Yes it is certainly possible to construct a universal clock.

If you are at rest with respect to the average matter in the universe (basically this means being at rest with respect to the cosmic microwave background), and not in a gravitational field, then you are a comoving observer. Every comoving observer will agree on the time since the Big Bang (13.798 $\pm$ 0.037 billion years), and they will all agree on the rate that time passes i.e. the length of the second (defined using your caesium standard). So we can use the number of seconds since the Big Bang as a universal clock that applies everywhere in the universe.

This isn't a particularly practical clock, since we have little hope of every knowing the age of the universe to an accuracy comparable to one second. Still, in principle it could be done.

If you get in a spaceship and fly around the universe then your local clock will get out of sync with the universal clocks due to relativistic time dilation, but you can in principle calculate the loss of sync and correct your clock as you go. Likewise if you're in a gravitational field your local clock will run slower than the universal clock, but again this can in principle be corrected.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can the correction of the time be done based on measuring the cosmic background radiation, or does it require ie an accelerometer to track your acceleration, and determine your speed? $\endgroup$ – mirhagk Jun 17 '14 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ @mirhagk: both would work, though using accelerometers is a lot easier. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jun 18 '14 at 5:37
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, so it's definitely possible, if not yet feasible, to create a perfectly accurate clock that measures seconds, and in theory we could use unix timestamps universally. $\endgroup$ – mirhagk Jun 18 '14 at 15:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.