Is there a good reason not to pick $U(3)$ as the colour group? Is there any experiment or intrinsic reason that would ruled out $U(3)$ as colour group instead?


Suppose that $\text{U}(3)$ was the gauge group. We can decompose this as $$\text{U}(3)=\text{U}(1)\times\text{SU}(3),$$

which implies that in addition to the $\text{SU}(3)$ that has eight generators corresponding to eight gluons, there would be an additional generator for $\text{U}(1)$. The latter in principle corresponds to an additional gauge boson, but a theory of the strong interactions containing such a particle is inconsistent with experiment.

  • $\begingroup$ would the U(1) vector boson carry colour? It would resemble a photon, wouldn't it? $\endgroup$ – IamZack Jun 13 '14 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ No, it would be a singlet under the colour group, i.e. it would be uncharged. In this sense, it would be like a photon. $\endgroup$ – Frederic Brünner Jun 13 '14 at 20:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I see it, but i can't prove it. $\endgroup$ – IamZack Jun 13 '14 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ Does that mean you have a specific additional question? $\endgroup$ – Frederic Brünner Jun 13 '14 at 20:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not to be overly mathematically nitpicky, but shouldn't your direct product be a semi-direct product? See, e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_group#Properties $\endgroup$ – joshphysics Jun 13 '14 at 21:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.